PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGV vs. VSS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CGV vs. VSS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Conductor Global Equity Value ETF (CGV) and Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CGV vs. VSS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CGV
Conductor Global Equity Value ETF
6.16%23.11%-3.34%5.72%3.44%
VSS
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF
1.72%29.61%2.94%15.52%-3.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGV achieves a 6.16% return, which is significantly higher than VSS's 1.72% return.


CGV

1D
2.83%
1M
-8.21%
YTD
6.16%
6M
9.28%
1Y
30.67%
3Y*
9.97%
5Y*
10Y*

VSS

1D
3.06%
1M
-8.91%
YTD
1.72%
6M
4.71%
1Y
30.55%
3Y*
13.84%
5Y*
5.38%
10Y*
7.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CGV vs. VSS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGV has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VSS's 0.07% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CGV vs. VSS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGV
CGV Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGV Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
CGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGV Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

VSS
VSS Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
VSS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSS Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
VSS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSS Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGV vs. VSS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Conductor Global Equity Value ETF (CGV) and Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGVVSSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.90

1.88

+0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.54

2.50

+0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.38

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

2.54

-0.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.59

10.09

-0.50

CGV vs. VSS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGV Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the VSS Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGV and VSS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGVVSSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

1.88

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.52

+0.17

Correlation

The correlation between CGV and VSS is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CGV vs. VSS - Dividend Comparison

CGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.17%, more than VSS's 3.33% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CGV
Conductor Global Equity Value ETF
5.17%4.58%2.87%4.56%0.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VSS
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF
3.33%3.39%3.44%3.14%2.30%2.74%1.90%3.25%2.80%2.83%2.93%2.66%

Drawdowns

CGV vs. VSS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGV drawdown since its inception was -16.64%, smaller than the maximum VSS drawdown of -43.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGV and VSS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CGVVSSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.64%

-43.51%

+26.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.13%

-11.62%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.21%

-8.91%

+0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.67%

-9.72%

+6.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

2.93%

+0.22%

Volatility

CGV vs. VSS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Conductor Global Equity Value ETF (CGV) is 6.94%, while Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) has a volatility of 7.61%. This indicates that CGV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VSS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CGVVSSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.94%

7.61%

-0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.88%

11.00%

-0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.21%

16.37%

-0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.39%

16.26%

-2.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.39%

17.17%

-3.78%