PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGV vs. VSS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGV vs. VSS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Conductor Global Equity Value ETF (CGV) and Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CGV having a 7.53% return and VSS slightly higher at 7.79%.


CGV

1D
-1.57%
1M
-3.07%
YTD
7.53%
6M
6.77%
1Y
21.28%
3Y*
11.34%
5Y*
10Y*

VSS

1D
-2.68%
1M
-3.04%
YTD
7.79%
6M
7.51%
1Y
22.53%
3Y*
16.03%
5Y*
5.52%
10Y*
8.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGV vs. VSS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CGV
Conductor Global Equity Value ETF
7.53%23.11%-3.34%5.72%3.64%
VSS
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF
7.79%29.61%2.94%15.52%-4.12%

Correlation

The correlation between CGV and VSS is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2022

0.83

The correlation between CGV and VSS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

CGV vs. VSS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CGV
VSS

Basic Materials

21.2%
12.2%

Industrials

14.3%
18.7%

Consumer Defensive

12.6%
3.5%

Energy

11.7%
4.4%

Technology

11.7%
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
9.1%

Financial Services

5.2%
10.1%

Healthcare

4.2%
6.0%

Utilities

4.0%
2.5%

Communication Services

3.6%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.2%
7.1%

Basic Materials

CGV
21.2%
VSS
12.2%

Industrials

CGV
14.3%
VSS
18.7%

Consumer Defensive

CGV
12.6%
VSS
3.5%

Energy

CGV
11.7%
VSS
4.4%

Technology

CGV
11.7%
VSS
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

CGV
10.3%
VSS
9.1%

Financial Services

CGV
5.2%
VSS
10.1%

Healthcare

CGV
4.2%
VSS
6.0%

Utilities

CGV
4.0%
VSS
2.5%

Communication Services

CGV
3.6%
VSS
2.3%

Real Estate

CGV
1.2%
VSS
7.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGV vs. VSS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGV
CGV Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
CGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGV Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
CGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGV Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

VSS
VSS Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
VSS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSS Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
VSS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSS Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGV vs. VSS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Conductor Global Equity Value ETF (CGV) and Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CGVVSSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.27

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

1.95

-0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.96

7.24

-1.27

CGV vs. VSS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGV Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the VSS Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGV and VSS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CGV vs. VSS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGV drawdown since its inception was -16.64%, smaller than the maximum VSS drawdown of -43.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGV and VSS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGVVSSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.64%

-43.51%

+26.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.13%

-11.62%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.64%

-15.73%

-0.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.59%

-5.03%

-2.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.67%

-9.62%

+5.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.58%

3.12%

+0.46%

Volatility

CGV vs. VSS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Conductor Global Equity Value ETF (CGV) is 5.95%, while Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) has a volatility of 6.54%. This indicates that CGV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VSS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGVVSSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.95%

6.54%

-0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.72%

13.88%

-1.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.84%

15.81%

-0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.68%

16.63%

-2.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.68%

17.17%

-3.49%

CGV vs. VSS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGV has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VSS's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

CGV vs. VSS - Dividend Comparison

CGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.10%, more than VSS's 3.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CGV
Conductor Global Equity Value ETF
5.10%4.58%2.87%4.56%0.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VSS
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF
3.24%3.39%3.44%3.14%2.30%2.74%1.90%3.25%2.80%2.83%2.93%2.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


CGV and VSS have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VSS has higher volatility (6.54%) compared to CGV (5.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGV dropped -16.64% vs VSS's -43.51%.

On 3-year performance, VSS leads with 16.03% vs 11.34% for CGV. On fees, VSS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, CGV has been the lower-risk option at 5.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VSS has performed better with a 16.03% return vs 11.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VSS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for CGV.

CGV has the higher dividend yield at 5.10%, compared with 3.24% for VSS.

They also come from different issuers: Conductor Fund and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for CGV and 0.07% for VSS.

CGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGV and VSS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer