CGSM vs. VTEC
CGSM (Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF) and VTEC (Vanguard California Tax-Exempt Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. CGSM is actively managed, while VTEC is passively managed. Over the past year, CGSM returned 4.67% vs 6.48% for VTEC. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CGSM charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for VTEC.
Performance
CGSM vs. VTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGSM achieves a 1.37% return, which is significantly higher than VTEC's 1.03% return.
CGSM
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 1.37%
- 6M
- 1.64%
- 1Y
- 4.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTEC
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 1.03%
- 6M
- 1.39%
- 1Y
- 6.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CGSM vs. VTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CGSM Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF | 1.37% | 4.58% | 4.21% |
VTEC Vanguard California Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 1.03% | 3.98% | 1.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGSM and VTEC is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2024 | 0.64 |
The correlation between CGSM and VTEC shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGSM vs. VTEC — Risk / Return Rank
CGSM
VTEC
CGSM vs. VTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF (CGSM) and Vanguard California Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CGSM | VTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.82 | 1.50 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.98 | 2.28 | +1.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.02 | 7.58 | +5.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGSM | VTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.52 | 2.32 | +1.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.89 | 0.73 | +2.15 |
Drawdowns
CGSM vs. VTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGSM drawdown since its inception was -1.42%, smaller than the maximum VTEC drawdown of -4.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGSM and VTEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGSM | VTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.42% | -4.50% | +3.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.18% | -2.85% | +1.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -0.77% | +0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.24% | -1.12% | +0.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.36% | 0.86% | -0.50% |
Volatility
CGSM vs. VTEC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF (CGSM) is 0.43%, while Vanguard California Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEC) has a volatility of 0.86%. This indicates that CGSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGSM | VTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.43% | 0.86% | -0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.98% | 1.87% | -0.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33% | 2.82% | -1.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.79% | 3.75% | -1.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.79% | 3.75% | -1.96% |
CGSM vs. VTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGSM has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VTEC's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CGSM vs. VTEC - Dividend Comparison
CGSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, less than VTEC's 3.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CGSM Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF | 2.99% | 3.05% | 3.11% | 0.84% |
VTEC Vanguard California Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 3.16% | 3.13% | 2.54% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGSM and VTEC have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VTEC has higher volatility (0.86%) compared to CGSM (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGSM dropped -1.42% vs VTEC's -4.50%.
On 1-year performance, VTEC leads with 6.48% vs 4.67% for CGSM. On fees, VTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, CGSM has been the lower-risk option at 0.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VTEC has performed better with a 6.48% return vs 4.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CGSM.
VTEC has the higher dividend yield at 3.16%, compared with 2.99% for CGSM.
They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CGSM and 0.08% for VTEC.
CGSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.52 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CGSM and VTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer