CGRO vs. FCA

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

CGRO (CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF) and FCA (First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund) are both China Equities funds. CGRO is actively managed, while FCA is passively managed. Over the past year, CGRO returned -12.21% vs 9.90% for FCA. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CGRO charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FCA.

Performance

CGRO vs. FCA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF (CGRO) and First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund (FCA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGRO achieves a -12.97% return, which is significantly lower than FCA's -1.57% return.

CGRO

• 1D: 0.75%
• 1M: 12.95%
• 6M: -10.76%
• YTD: -12.97%
• 1Y: -12.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.45%

FCA

• 1D: 0.98%
• 1M: 3.05%
• 6M: -13.15%
• YTD: -1.57%
• 1Y: 9.90%
• 3Y*: 14.69%
• 5Y*: 2.87%
• 10Y*: 7.74%
• ALL TIME*: 2.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CGRO CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF	$6.01K	$9.52K	$35.25K
FCA First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund	$214.04K	$288.40K	$1.96M

CGRO vs. FCA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CGRO CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF	-12.97%	20.23%	14.75%	1.84%
FCA First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund	-1.57%	45.20%	14.07%	0.72%

Correlation

The correlation between CGRO and FCA is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2023	0.60

The correlation between CGRO and FCA shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CGRO vs. FCA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CGRO	FCA
Consumer Cyclical	42.4%	1.0%
Industrials	16.4%	22.3%
Communication Services	15.0%	2.7%
Technology	12.8%	15.2%
Healthcare	7.4%	3.2%
Financial Services	2.9%	21.0%
Consumer Defensive	2.0%	0.5%
Real Estate	1.1%	1.0%
Basic Materials	-	17.2%
Energy	-	13.5%
Utilities	-	2.4%

Return for Risk

CGRO vs. FCA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CGRO

CGRO Risk / Return Rank: 5
CGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
CGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
CGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 5
CGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
CGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 6

FCA

FCA Risk / Return Rank: 18
FCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
FCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
FCA Omega Ratio Rank: 19
FCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
FCA Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CGRO vs. FCA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF (CGRO) and First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund (FCA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CGRO	FCA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.53	0.43	-0.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.63	0.71	-1.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	1.09	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.34	0.41	-0.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.63	1.16	-1.79

CGRO vs. FCA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGRO Sharpe Ratio is -0.53, which is lower than the FCA Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGRO and FCA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CGRO vs. FCA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGRO drawdown since its inception was -36.53%, smaller than the maximum FCA drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGRO and FCA.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGRO	FCA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.53%	-45.56%	+9.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.53%	-24.11%	-12.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.13%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-42.47%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.47%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.62%	-19.58%	-6.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.47%	-21.60%	+10.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.35%	8.56%	+10.79%

Volatility

CGRO vs. FCA - Volatility Comparison

CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF (CGRO) has a higher volatility of 6.15% compared to First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund (FCA) at 5.76%. This indicates that CGRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGRO	FCA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.15%	5.76%	+0.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.63%	17.66%	-1.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.09%	23.35%	-0.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.67%	27.76%	+0.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.67%	26.75%	+1.92%

CGRO vs. FCA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGRO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than FCA's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGRO vs. FCA - Dividend Comparison

CGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, more than FCA's 2.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CGRO CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF	3.22%	2.48%	2.47%	0.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FCA First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund	2.87%	2.67%	5.17%	5.70%	6.00%	4.91%	4.12%	3.73%	3.10%	2.30%	2.51%	4.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGRO and FCA in my portfolio?

CGRO and FCA have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CGRO or FCA?

CGRO has higher volatility (6.15%) compared to FCA (5.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGRO dropped -36.53% vs FCA's -45.56%.

Which ETF is better, CGRO or FCA?

On 1-year performance, FCA leads with 9.90% vs -12.21% for CGRO. On fees, CGRO is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, FCA has been the lower-risk option at 5.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CGRO or FCA?

Over the 1-year period, FCA has performed better with a 9.90% return vs -12.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGRO or FCA?

CGRO is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FCA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGRO or FCA?

CGRO has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 2.87% for FCA.

What is the main difference between CGRO and FCA?

They also come from different issuers: CoreValues and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CGRO and 0.80% for FCA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.43 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.