CGRA.TO vs. CINF.TO
CGRA.TO (CI Global Real Asset Private Pool) and CINF.TO (CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool) are both exchange-traded funds - CGRA.TO is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by CI, while CINF.TO is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by CI. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, CGRA.TO returned 7.83%/yr vs 12.24%/yr for CINF.TO. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CGRA.TO vs. CINF.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGRA.TO achieves a 15.81% return, which is significantly lower than CINF.TO's 17.05% return.
CGRA.TO
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- 6M
- 12.10%
- YTD
- 15.81%
- 1Y
- 18.40%
- 3Y*
- 13.38%
- 5Y*
- 7.83%
- 10Y*
- —
CINF.TO
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- 6M
- 13.71%
- YTD
- 17.05%
- 1Y
- 21.62%
- 3Y*
- 16.65%
- 5Y*
- 12.24%
- 10Y*
- —
CGRA.TO vs. CINF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGRA.TO CI Global Real Asset Private Pool | 15.81% | 7.16% | 10.58% | 6.33% | -9.03% | 20.00% | 6.00% |
CINF.TO CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool | 17.05% | 12.54% | 16.53% | 5.27% | 5.03% | 13.56% | 7.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGRA.TO and CINF.TO is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2020 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGRA.TO vs. CINF.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CGRA.TO
CINF.TO
CGRA.TO vs. CINF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Global Real Asset Private Pool (CGRA.TO) and CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool (CINF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CGRA.TO | CINF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.74 | 1.41 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 4.09 | -1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.72 | 12.09 | -1.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CGRA.TO vs. CINF.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGRA.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.03%, which is greater than CINF.TO's maximum drawdown of -12.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGRA.TO and CINF.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGRA.TO | CINF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.03% | -12.27% | -3.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.43% | -5.31% | -1.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.89% | -9.62% | +1.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.03% | -12.27% | -3.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -1.07% | +0.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.80% | -2.05% | -1.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.72% | 1.79% | -0.07% |
Volatility
CGRA.TO vs. CINF.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CI Global Real Asset Private Pool (CGRA.TO) is 1.25%, while CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool (CINF.TO) has a volatility of 2.03%. This indicates that CGRA.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CINF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGRA.TO | CINF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.25% | 2.03% | -0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.75% | 7.75% | -1.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.45% | 9.56% | -1.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.13% | 11.96% | +0.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.64% | 12.07% | -0.43% |
Dividends
CGRA.TO vs. CINF.TO - Dividend Comparison
CGRA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, more than CINF.TO's 2.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGRA.TO CI Global Real Asset Private Pool | 3.54% | 4.02% | 4.14% | 4.39% | 4.46% | 3.89% | 2.61% |
CINF.TO CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool | 2.42% | 2.80% | 3.06% | 3.45% | 3.51% | 3.56% | 2.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGRA.TO and CINF.TO have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CGRA.TO is categorized as Global Allocation, while CINF.TO is Utilities Equities.
Find the right allocation for CGRA.TO and CINF.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer