CGRA.TO vs. ZBAL.TO
CGRA.TO (CI Global Real Asset Private Pool) and ZBAL.TO (BMO Balanced ETF) are both Global Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, CGRA.TO returned 7.84%/yr vs 8.21%/yr for ZBAL.TO. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CGRA.TO vs. ZBAL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGRA.TO achieves a 15.15% return, which is significantly higher than ZBAL.TO's 9.27% return.
CGRA.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.45%
- YTD
- 15.15%
- 6M
- 15.15%
- 1Y
- 17.05%
- 3Y*
- 13.99%
- 5Y*
- 7.84%
- 10Y*
- —
ZBAL.TO
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 1.43%
- YTD
- 9.27%
- 6M
- 8.90%
- 1Y
- 17.02%
- 3Y*
- 14.18%
- 5Y*
- 8.21%
- 10Y*
- —
CGRA.TO vs. ZBAL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGRA.TO CI Global Real Asset Private Pool | 15.15% | 7.16% | 10.58% | 6.33% | -9.03% | 20.00% | 6.05% |
ZBAL.TO BMO Balanced ETF | 9.27% | 11.34% | 16.15% | 12.61% | -11.11% | 10.39% | 12.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGRA.TO and ZBAL.TO is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2020 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGRA.TO vs. ZBAL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CGRA.TO
ZBAL.TO
CGRA.TO vs. ZBAL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Global Real Asset Private Pool (CGRA.TO) and BMO Balanced ETF (ZBAL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CGRA.TO | ZBAL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.70 | 1.34 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 2.94 | -0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.91 | 11.71 | -1.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CGRA.TO vs. ZBAL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGRA.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.03%, smaller than the maximum ZBAL.TO drawdown of -20.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGRA.TO and ZBAL.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGRA.TO | ZBAL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.03% | -20.75% | +4.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.43% | -5.81% | -0.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.89% | -9.44% | +1.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.03% | -16.32% | +0.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.59% | +1.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.83% | -3.18% | -0.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.73% | 1.46% | +0.27% |
Volatility
CGRA.TO vs. ZBAL.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CI Global Real Asset Private Pool (CGRA.TO) is 2.67%, while BMO Balanced ETF (ZBAL.TO) has a volatility of 4.04%. This indicates that CGRA.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZBAL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGRA.TO | ZBAL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.67% | 4.04% | -1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.14% | 7.53% | -0.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.43% | 9.24% | -0.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.12% | 8.88% | +3.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.68% | 10.16% | +1.52% |
Dividends
CGRA.TO vs. ZBAL.TO - Dividend Comparison
CGRA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, more than ZBAL.TO's 1.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGRA.TO CI Global Real Asset Private Pool | 3.56% | 4.02% | 4.14% | 4.39% | 4.46% | 3.89% | 2.61% | 0.00% |
ZBAL.TO BMO Balanced ETF | 1.64% | 2.02% | 2.18% | 2.48% | 2.72% | 2.35% | 2.53% | 2.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGRA.TO and ZBAL.TO have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: CI and BMO.
Find the right allocation for CGRA.TO and ZBAL.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer