CGR.TO vs. PRA.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CGR.TO (iShares Global Real Estate Index ETF) and PRA.TO (Purpose Diversified Real Asset Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - CGR.TO is a REIT fund tracking the Morningstar DM REIT NR CAD, while PRA.TO is a fund fund. Over the past 10 years, CGR.TO returned 3.96%/yr vs 10.80%/yr for PRA.TO. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CGR.TO vs. PRA.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Global Real Estate Index ETF (CGR.TO) and Purpose Diversified Real Asset Fund (PRA.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGR.TO achieves a 7.84% return, which is significantly lower than PRA.TO's 24.32% return. Over the past 10 years, CGR.TO has underperformed PRA.TO with an annualized return of 3.96%, while PRA.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.80% annualized return.

CGR.TO

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: -0.61%
• YTD: 7.84%
• 6M: 6.09%
• 1Y: 9.02%
• 3Y*: 9.97%
• 5Y*: 3.60%
• 10Y*: 3.96%

PRA.TO

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: 0.83%
• YTD: 24.32%
• 6M: 24.16%
• 1Y: 42.26%
• 3Y*: 19.55%
• 5Y*: 15.00%
• 10Y*: 10.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGR.TO vs. PRA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CGR.TO iShares Global Real Estate Index ETF	7.84%	2.56%	9.99%	7.58%	-21.75%	28.98%	-9.40%	14.90%	2.92%	3.32%
PRA.TO Purpose Diversified Real Asset Fund	24.32%	18.21%	8.78%	2.07%	15.88%	23.55%	5.06%	14.16%	-7.41%	3.51%

Correlation

The correlation between CGR.TO and PRA.TO is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.37
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2013	0.21

The correlation between CGR.TO and PRA.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.37 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CGR.TO vs. PRA.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CGR.TO	PRA.TO
Real Estate	100.0%	15.4%
Financial Services	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	35.8%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	10.8%
Energy	-	20.4%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	1.0%
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	16.7%

Return for Risk

CGR.TO vs. PRA.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGR.TO

CGR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 21
CGR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
CGR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
CGR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 20
CGR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
CGR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 24

PRA.TO

PRA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 94
PRA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
PRA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
PRA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 91
PRA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
PRA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGR.TO vs. PRA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Real Estate Index ETF (CGR.TO) and Purpose Diversified Real Asset Fund (PRA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CGR.TO	PRA.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.72	3.43	-2.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.08	4.58	-3.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.61	-0.47
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.95	13.02	-12.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.03	36.59	-33.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CGR.TO vs. PRA.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the PRA.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGR.TO and PRA.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGR.TO	PRA.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72	3.43	-2.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24	1.12	-0.88
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24	0.75	-0.51
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	0.55	-0.28

Drawdowns

CGR.TO vs. PRA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGR.TO drawdown since its inception was -52.90%, which is greater than PRA.TO's maximum drawdown of -34.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGR.TO and PRA.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGR.TO	PRA.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.90%	-34.43%	-18.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.55%	-3.26%	-6.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.40%	-13.47%	-0.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.76%	-19.37%	-9.39%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.71%	-32.26%	-1.45%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.99%	-1.78%	-1.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.98%	-7.71%	-2.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.99%	1.16%	+1.83%

Volatility

CGR.TO vs. PRA.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Real Estate Index ETF (CGR.TO) and Purpose Diversified Real Asset Fund (PRA.TO) have volatilities of 3.77% and 3.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGR.TO	PRA.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.77%	3.79%	-0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.87%	9.45%	+0.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.51%	12.40%	+0.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.01%	13.47%	+1.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.56%	14.41%	+2.15%

Dividends

CGR.TO vs. PRA.TO - Dividend Comparison

CGR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, more than PRA.TO's 2.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CGR.TO iShares Global Real Estate Index ETF	2.33%	2.51%	2.52%	2.59%	2.40%	1.70%	2.22%	2.10%	2.54%	4.25%	2.83%	2.97%
PRA.TO Purpose Diversified Real Asset Fund	2.09%	3.23%	2.95%	3.12%	1.93%	1.25%	1.52%	1.57%	1.77%	1.55%	1.64%	2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGR.TO and PRA.TO in my portfolio?

CGR.TO and PRA.TO have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.