PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGR.TO vs. VNQI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CGR.TO vs. VNQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Global Real Estate Index ETF (CGR.TO) and Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CGR.TO vs. VNQI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CGR.TO
iShares Global Real Estate Index ETF
3.43%2.56%9.99%7.58%-21.75%28.98%-9.40%14.90%2.92%3.32%
VNQI
Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF
-1.72%15.82%6.18%4.64%-17.45%4.97%-8.79%15.62%-1.76%18.82%
Different Trading Currencies

CGR.TO is traded in CAD, while VNQI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VNQI values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGR.TO achieves a 3.43% return, which is significantly higher than VNQI's -1.72% return. Over the past 10 years, CGR.TO has outperformed VNQI with an annualized return of 3.56%, while VNQI has yielded a comparatively lower 3.14% annualized return.


CGR.TO

1D
2.33%
1M
-6.96%
YTD
3.43%
6M
0.51%
1Y
3.51%
3Y*
7.87%
5Y*
3.85%
10Y*
3.56%

VNQI

1D
2.47%
1M
-10.61%
YTD
-1.72%
6M
-2.55%
1Y
11.25%
3Y*
8.89%
5Y*
1.56%
10Y*
3.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CGR.TO vs. VNQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGR.TO has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than VNQI's 0.12% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CGR.TO vs. VNQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGR.TO
CGR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
CGR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
CGR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

VNQI
VNQI Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
VNQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNQI Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VNQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNQI Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGR.TO vs. VNQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Real Estate Index ETF (CGR.TO) and Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGR.TOVNQIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.24

0.89

-0.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.42

1.26

-0.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.17

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.39

0.84

-0.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.31

3.47

-2.16

CGR.TO vs. VNQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the VNQI Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGR.TO and VNQI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGR.TOVNQIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

0.89

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.12

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

0.23

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.39

-0.13

Correlation

The correlation between CGR.TO and VNQI is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CGR.TO vs. VNQI - Dividend Comparison

CGR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, less than VNQI's 4.85% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CGR.TO
iShares Global Real Estate Index ETF
2.43%2.51%2.52%2.59%2.40%1.70%2.22%2.10%2.54%4.25%2.83%2.97%
VNQI
Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF
4.85%4.70%5.16%3.74%0.57%6.48%0.93%7.58%4.62%3.86%5.18%2.86%

Drawdowns

CGR.TO vs. VNQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGR.TO drawdown since its inception was -52.90%, which is greater than VNQI's maximum drawdown of -32.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGR.TO and VNQI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CGR.TOVNQIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.90%

-38.35%

-14.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.05%

-14.78%

+3.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.76%

-35.75%

+6.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.71%

-38.35%

+4.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.96%

-12.43%

+5.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.06%

-10.92%

+0.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

3.32%

-0.02%

Volatility

CGR.TO vs. VNQI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Real Estate Index ETF (CGR.TO) is 5.64%, while Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI) has a volatility of 6.29%. This indicates that CGR.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VNQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CGR.TOVNQIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.64%

6.29%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.08%

8.94%

+0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.72%

12.70%

+2.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.95%

12.80%

+2.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.53%

13.44%

+3.09%