PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGON vs. UTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CGON vs. UTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CG Oncology, Inc (CGON) and Reaves Utility Income Trust (UTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGON achieves a 31.07% return, which is significantly higher than UTG's 16.83% return.


CGON

1D
-2.00%
1M
-19.62%
YTD
31.07%
6M
27.72%
1Y
103.14%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UTG

1D
-0.12%
1M
-2.28%
YTD
16.83%
6M
14.83%
1Y
27.73%
3Y*
24.38%
5Y*
11.47%
10Y*
10.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGON vs. UTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CGON
CG Oncology, Inc
31.07%44.77%-22.84%
UTG
Reaves Utility Income Trust
16.83%23.24%31.49%

Correlation

The correlation between CGON and UTG is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2024

0.13

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CGON:

$4.60B

UTG:

$3.77B

EPS

CGON:

-$1.61

UTG:

$18.20

PS Ratio

CGON:

844.52

UTG:

7.17

PB Ratio

CGON:

4.21

UTG:

1.07

Total Revenue (TTM)

CGON:

$5.07M

UTG:

$525.39M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CGON:

-$2.54M

UTG:

$228.88M

EBITDA (TTM)

CGON:

-$191.51M

UTG:

$1.71B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGON vs. UTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGON
CGON Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CGON Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGON Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGON Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
CGON Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGON Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

UTG
UTG Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
UTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTG Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
UTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTG Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGON vs. UTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CG Oncology, Inc (CGON) and Reaves Utility Income Trust (UTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGONUTGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.83

1.67

+0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.82

2.16

+0.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.29

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.92

2.40

+1.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.56

5.36

+8.20

CGON vs. UTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGON Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the UTG Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGON and UTG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGONUTGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

1.67

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.48

-0.21

Drawdowns

CGON vs. UTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGON drawdown since its inception was -67.47%, roughly equal to the maximum UTG drawdown of -67.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGON and UTG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGONUTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.47%

-67.77%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.46%

-11.59%

-14.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.46%

-3.53%

-22.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.94%

-8.74%

-17.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.63%

5.18%

+2.45%

Volatility

CGON vs. UTG - Volatility Comparison

CG Oncology, Inc (CGON) has a higher volatility of 14.38% compared to Reaves Utility Income Trust (UTG) at 6.08%. This indicates that CGON's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGONUTGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.38%

6.08%

+8.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.68%

12.74%

+28.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.74%

16.65%

+40.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

64.20%

16.80%

+47.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

64.20%

21.59%

+42.61%

Dividends

CGON vs. UTG - Dividend Comparison

CGON has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.70%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CGON
CG Oncology, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UTG
Reaves Utility Income Trust
5.70%6.42%7.19%8.53%8.07%6.35%6.59%5.69%6.86%6.21%9.02%6.86%

Financials

CGON vs. UTG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CG Oncology, Inc and Reaves Utility Income Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
1.08M
76.73M
(CGON) Total Revenue
(UTG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CGON and UTG have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CGON has higher volatility (14.38%) compared to UTG (6.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGON dropped -67.47% vs UTG's -67.77%.

CGON currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGON and UTG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer