PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGON vs. DY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CGON vs. DY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CG Oncology, Inc (CGON) and Dycom Industries, Inc. (DY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGON achieves a 71.46% return, which is significantly higher than DY's 18.69% return.


CGON

1D
-2.52%
1M
1.18%
6M
36.77%
YTD
71.46%
1Y
170.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
42.95%

DY

1D
-3.85%
1M
-8.38%
6M
10.07%
YTD
18.69%
1Y
52.33%
3Y*
58.45%
5Y*
42.03%
10Y*
15.82%
ALL TIME*
13.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$59.82M$66.58M$70.32M
$195.20M$192.79M$262.31M

CGON vs. DY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CGON
CG Oncology, Inc
71.46%44.77%-1.10%
DY
Dycom Industries, Inc.
18.69%94.13%53.78%

Correlation

The correlation between CGON and DY is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2024

0.25

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CGON:

$6.28B

DY:

$12.04B

EPS

CGON:

-$1.59

DY:

$10.48

PS Ratio

CGON:

1.12K

DY:

1.91

PB Ratio

CGON:

5.51

DY:

6.43

Total Revenue (TTM)

CGON:

$5.07M

DY:

$6.25B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CGON:

-$2.54M

DY:

$1.23B

EBITDA (TTM)

CGON:

-$191.51M

DY:

$1.07B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGON vs. DY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CGON
CGON Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
CGON Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGON Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGON Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
CGON Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGON Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

DY
DY Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
DY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DY Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
DY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DY Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CGON vs. DY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CG Oncology, Inc (CGON) and Dycom Industries, Inc. (DY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CGONDYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.21

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.12

1.62

+4.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.55

4.91

+14.64

CGON vs. DY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGON Sharpe Ratio is 2.88, which is higher than the DY Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGON and DY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CGON vs. DY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGON drawdown since its inception was -67.47%, smaller than the maximum DY drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGON and DY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGONDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.47%

-93.54%

+26.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.41%

-30.51%

+3.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.38%

-25.06%

+19.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.86%

-45.56%

+20.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.57%

10.06%

-1.49%

Volatility

CGON vs. DY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CG Oncology, Inc (CGON) is 15.19%, while Dycom Industries, Inc. (DY) has a volatility of 19.81%. This indicates that CGON experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGONDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.19%

19.81%

-4.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.97%

42.94%

-7.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.21%

50.41%

+7.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

65.95%

44.18%

+21.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

65.95%

53.32%

+12.63%

Dividends

CGON vs. DY - Dividend Comparison

Neither CGON nor DY has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CGON vs. DY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CG Oncology, Inc and Dycom Industries, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CGON and DY have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DY has higher volatility (19.81%) compared to CGON (15.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGON dropped -67.47% vs DY's -93.54%.

CGON currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGON and DY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer