CGNAX vs. GDX

Last updated Jul 2, 2026

CGNAX (American Funds Growth and Income Portfolio) and GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF) are both funds - CGNAX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by American Funds, while GDX is a Gold fund tracking the NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. Over the past 10 years, CGNAX returned 10.79%/yr vs 11.04%/yr for GDX. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CGNAX charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for GDX.

Performance

CGNAX vs. GDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Growth and Income Portfolio (CGNAX) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGNAX achieves a 9.17% return, which is significantly higher than GDX's -12.48% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CGNAX having a 10.79% annualized return and GDX not far ahead at 11.04%.

CGNAX

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: 0.48%
• YTD: 9.17%
• 6M: 9.17%
• 1Y: 17.87%
• 3Y*: 16.66%
• 5Y*: 9.16%
• 10Y*: 10.79%

GDX

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: -13.39%
• YTD: -12.48%
• 6M: -12.48%
• 1Y: 45.30%
• 3Y*: 37.20%
• 5Y*: 18.51%
• 10Y*: 11.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGNAX vs. GDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CGNAX American Funds Growth and Income Portfolio	9.17%	17.85%	14.51%	18.73%	-15.96%	16.36%	16.31%	21.78%	-5.88%	18.99%
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF	-12.48%	154.77%	10.63%	9.98%	-9.01%	-9.52%	23.66%	39.84%	-8.77%	11.99%

Correlation

The correlation between CGNAX and GDX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2012	0.26

Over the past year, CGNAX and GDX have become more correlated (0.46) than their long-term average of 0.26, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

CGNAX vs. GDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGNAX

CGNAX Risk / Return Rank: 49
CGNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
CGNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
CGNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
CGNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
CGNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 56

GDX

GDX Risk / Return Rank: 28
GDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
GDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
GDX Omega Ratio Rank: 31
GDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
GDX Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGNAX vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Growth and Income Portfolio (CGNAX) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CGNAX	GDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	0.96	+0.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.34	1.40	+0.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.19	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.13	1.25	+0.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.47	3.07	+6.39

CGNAX vs. GDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGNAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the GDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGNAX and GDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CGNAX vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGNAX drawdown since its inception was -26.56%, smaller than the maximum GDX drawdown of -80.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGNAX and GDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGNAX	GDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.56%	-80.34%	+53.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.28%	-36.28%	+28.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.09%	-36.28%	+23.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.14%	-46.51%	+23.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.56%	-49.79%	+23.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-35.20%	+35.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.44%	-40.39%	+36.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.86%	14.78%	-12.92%

Volatility

CGNAX vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Growth and Income Portfolio (CGNAX) is 4.21%, while VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a volatility of 16.66%. This indicates that CGNAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGNAX	GDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.21%	16.66%	-12.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.79%	39.61%	-30.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.69%	47.60%	-36.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.71%	36.94%	-24.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.15%	37.35%	-24.20%

CGNAX vs. GDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGNAX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than GDX's 0.51% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGNAX vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison

CGNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.17%, more than GDX's 0.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CGNAX American Funds Growth and Income Portfolio	5.17%	5.48%	4.79%	2.78%	6.42%	5.11%	3.97%	5.48%	6.06%	3.40%	4.30%	4.51%
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF	0.84%	0.74%	1.19%	1.61%	1.66%	1.67%	0.53%	0.67%	0.50%	0.76%	0.26%	0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGNAX and GDX in my portfolio?

CGNAX and GDX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CGNAX or GDX?

GDX has higher volatility (16.66%) compared to CGNAX (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGNAX dropped -26.56% vs GDX's -80.34%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGNAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.