CGMU vs. NFLX
CGMU (Capital Group Municipal Income ETF) is Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Capital Group, while NFLX (Netflix, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, CGMU returned 4.67%/yr vs 25.31%/yr for NFLX. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CGMU vs. NFLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGMU achieves a 1.46% return, which is significantly higher than NFLX's -11.86% return.
CGMU
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 2.01%
- 1Y
- 6.88%
- 3Y*
- 4.67%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NFLX
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -5.54%
- YTD
- -11.86%
- 6M
- -14.62%
- 1Y
- -33.43%
- 3Y*
- 25.31%
- 5Y*
- 11.21%
- 10Y*
- 24.31%
CGMU vs. NFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGMU Capital Group Municipal Income ETF | 1.46% | 5.19% | 2.64% | 6.76% | 4.53% |
NFLX Netflix, Inc. | -11.86% | 5.19% | 83.07% | 65.11% | -0.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGMU and NFLX is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2022 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGMU vs. NFLX — Risk / Return Rank
CGMU
NFLX
CGMU vs. NFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU) and Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CGMU | NFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.65 | 0.82 | +0.84 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | -0.77 | +3.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.76 | -1.36 | +10.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGMU | NFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.02 | -1.01 | +4.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.66 | 0.58 | +1.08 |
Drawdowns
CGMU vs. NFLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGMU drawdown since its inception was -4.11%, smaller than the maximum NFLX drawdown of -81.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGMU and NFLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGMU | NFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.11% | -81.99% | +77.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.55% | -43.35% | +40.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.89% | -43.35% | +39.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -75.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.82% | -38.29% | +37.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.84% | -24.90% | +24.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.79% | 24.70% | -23.91% |
Volatility
CGMU vs. NFLX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU) is 0.82%, while Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) has a volatility of 6.64%. This indicates that CGMU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NFLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGMU | NFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.82% | 6.64% | -5.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.74% | 25.22% | -23.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.29% | 33.15% | -30.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.47% | 43.10% | -39.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.47% | 41.52% | -38.05% |
Dividends
CGMU vs. NFLX - Dividend Comparison
CGMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, while NFLX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGMU Capital Group Municipal Income ETF | 3.33% | 3.32% | 3.21% | 3.08% | 0.49% |
NFLX Netflix, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGMU and NFLX have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NFLX has higher volatility (6.64%) compared to CGMU (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGMU dropped -4.11% vs NFLX's -81.99%.
CGMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CGMU and NFLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer