CGIC vs. VEA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CGIC (Capital Group International Core Equity ETF) and VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. CGIC is actively managed, while VEA is passively managed. Over the past year, CGIC returned 30.79% vs 32.48% for VEA. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. CGIC charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VEA.

Performance

CGIC vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group International Core Equity ETF (CGIC) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGIC achieves a 12.85% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 14.92% return.

CGIC

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: 5.13%
• YTD: 12.85%
• 6M: 15.39%
• 1Y: 30.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VEA

• 1D: -0.90%
• 1M: 5.54%
• YTD: 14.92%
• 6M: 18.15%
• 1Y: 32.48%
• 3Y*: 19.77%
• 5Y*: 9.60%
• 10Y*: 10.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGIC vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CGIC Capital Group International Core Equity ETF	12.85%	37.53%	-2.81%
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF	14.92%	35.16%	-1.44%

Correlation

The correlation between CGIC and VEA is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2024	0.96

The correlation between CGIC and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

CGIC vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CGIC	VEA
Financial Services	20.2%	23.3%
Technology	16.7%	13.8%
Industrials	13.9%	19.2%
Basic Materials	8.8%	7.5%
Consumer Defensive	8.1%	5.6%
Consumer Cyclical	7.4%	7.5%
Communication Services	7.3%	3.4%
Energy	6.2%	5.4%
Healthcare	5.6%	8.2%
Utilities	4.1%	3.3%
Real Estate	1.8%	2.7%

Return for Risk

CGIC vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGIC

CGIC Risk / Return Rank: 58
CGIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
CGIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
CGIC Omega Ratio Rank: 60
CGIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
CGIC Martin Ratio Rank: 59

VEA

VEA Risk / Return Rank: 59
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 60
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGIC vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group International Core Equity ETF (CGIC) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CGIC	VEA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	2.09	-0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.83	2.87	-0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.38	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.74	2.81	-0.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.54	10.94	-0.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CGIC vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGIC Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGIC and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGIC	VEA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.06	2.09	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.48	0.25	+1.23

Drawdowns

CGIC vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGIC drawdown since its inception was -13.10%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGIC and VEA.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGIC	VEA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.10%	-60.68%	+47.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.30%	-11.63%	+0.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.45%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.71%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.04%	-0.90%	-0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.54%	-13.29%	+10.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.93%	2.98%	-0.05%

Volatility

CGIC vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group International Core Equity ETF (CGIC) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) have volatilities of 5.82% and 5.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGIC	VEA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.82%	5.66%	+0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.82%	13.32%	-0.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.01%	15.66%	-0.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.14%	16.55%	-0.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.14%	17.36%	-1.22%

CGIC vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGIC has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGIC vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

CGIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than VEA's 2.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CGIC Capital Group International Core Equity ETF	1.32%	1.60%	0.68%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF	2.62%	3.22%	3.35%	3.15%	2.91%	3.16%	2.04%	3.04%	3.35%	2.77%	3.05%	2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGIC and VEA in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, CGIC and VEA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CGIC or VEA?

CGIC has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to VEA (5.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGIC dropped -13.10% vs VEA's -60.68%.

Which ETF is better, CGIC or VEA?

On 1-year performance, VEA leads with 32.48% vs 30.79% for CGIC. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VEA has been the lower-risk option at 5.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CGIC or VEA?

Over the 1-year period, VEA has performed better with a 32.48% return vs 30.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGIC or VEA?

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for CGIC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGIC or VEA?

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 1.32% for CGIC.

What is the main difference between CGIC and VEA?

They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for CGIC and 0.03% for VEA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.