CGHY vs. RCLR

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

CGHY (Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF) and RCLR (Reckoner BBB-B CLO Reinvesting ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGHY is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by Capital Group, while RCLR is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by Reckoner. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CGHY charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for RCLR.

Performance

CGHY vs. RCLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF (CGHY) and Reckoner BBB-B CLO Reinvesting ETF (RCLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CGHY

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.09%
• 6M: 1.82%
• YTD: 2.14%
• 1Y: 6.22%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RCLR

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 0.09%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGHY vs. RCLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CGHY Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF	1.23%
RCLR Reckoner BBB-B CLO Reinvesting ETF	1.10%

Correlation

The correlation between CGHY and RCLR is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2026	0.23

Return for Risk

CGHY vs. RCLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGHY

CGHY Risk / Return Rank: 75
CGHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
CGHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
CGHY Omega Ratio Rank: 78
CGHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
CGHY Martin Ratio Rank: 78

RCLR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGHY vs. RCLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF (CGHY) and Reckoner BBB-B CLO Reinvesting ETF (RCLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CGHY	RCLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.86	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.94	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.58	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.76	—	—

Drawdowns

CGHY vs. RCLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGHY drawdown since its inception was -2.38%, smaller than the maximum RCLR drawdown of -3.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGHY and RCLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGHY	RCLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.38%	-3.77%	+1.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.38%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.24%	0.00%	-0.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.30%	-0.82%	+0.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.52%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CGHY	RCLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.71%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.69%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.30%	3.88%	-0.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.28%	3.88%	-0.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.28%	3.88%	-0.60%

CGHY vs. RCLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGHY has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than RCLR's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGHY vs. RCLR - Dividend Comparison

CGHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.46%, while RCLR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
CGHY Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF	5.46%	3.09%
RCLR Reckoner BBB-B CLO Reinvesting ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGHY and RCLR in my portfolio?

CGHY and RCLR have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CGHY or RCLR?

On fees, CGHY is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGHY or RCLR?

CGHY is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for RCLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGHY or RCLR?

CGHY has the higher dividend yield at 5.46%, compared with 0.00% for RCLR.

What is the main difference between CGHY and RCLR?

CGHY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while RCLR is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Reckoner. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for CGHY and 0.60% for RCLR.