CGHY vs. LDRH
CGHY (Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF) and LDRH (iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CGHY charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for LDRH.
Performance
CGHY vs. LDRH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGHY achieves a 2.11% return, which is significantly higher than LDRH's 1.88% return.
CGHY
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- 2.11%
- 6M
- 2.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LDRH
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.88%
- 6M
- 2.45%
- 1Y
- 6.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CGHY vs. LDRH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CGHY Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF | 2.11% | 3.77% |
LDRH iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF | 1.88% | 3.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGHY and LDRH is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGHY vs. LDRH — Risk / Return Rank
CGHY
LDRH
CGHY vs. LDRH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF (CGHY) and iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGHY | LDRH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.92 | 1.70 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
CGHY vs. LDRH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGHY drawdown since its inception was -2.38%, smaller than the maximum LDRH drawdown of -3.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGHY and LDRH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGHY | LDRH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.38% | -3.17% | +0.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -0.12% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.31% | -0.24% | -0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.30% | — |
Volatility
CGHY vs. LDRH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGHY | LDRH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.69% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.97% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.33% | 2.61% | +0.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.33% | 3.51% | -0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.33% | 3.51% | -0.18% |
CGHY vs. LDRH - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGHY has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than LDRH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGHY vs. LDRH - Dividend Comparison
CGHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.07%, less than LDRH's 6.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CGHY Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF | 5.07% | 3.09% | 0.00% |
LDRH iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF | 6.99% | 6.41% | 1.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGHY and LDRH have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LDRH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LDRH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for CGHY.
LDRH has the higher dividend yield at 6.99%, compared with 5.07% for CGHY.
They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for CGHY and 0.35% for LDRH.
Find the right allocation for CGHY and LDRH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer