CGHY vs. BSJR

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CGHY (Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF) and BSJR (Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CGHY charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for BSJR.

Performance

CGHY vs. BSJR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF (CGHY) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGHY achieves a 2.11% return, which is significantly higher than BSJR's 1.27% return.

CGHY

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 0.58%
• YTD: 2.11%
• 6M: 2.60%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BSJR

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 0.25%
• YTD: 1.27%
• 6M: 1.81%
• 1Y: 4.78%
• 3Y*: 7.93%
• 5Y*: 3.40%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGHY vs. BSJR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CGHY Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF	2.11%	3.77%
BSJR Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	1.27%	2.70%

Correlation

The correlation between CGHY and BSJR is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025	0.68

Return for Risk

CGHY vs. BSJR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSJR

BSJR Risk / Return Rank: 79
BSJR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
BSJR Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
BSJR Omega Ratio Rank: 77
BSJR Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
BSJR Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGHY vs. BSJR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF (CGHY) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGHY	BSJR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.27	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.51	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.92	0.43	+1.49

Drawdowns

CGHY vs. BSJR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGHY drawdown since its inception was -2.38%, smaller than the maximum BSJR drawdown of -22.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGHY and BSJR.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGHY	BSJR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.38%	-22.58%	+20.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-1.16%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-3.15%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.37%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.14%	-0.11%	-0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.31%	-3.25%	+2.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.25%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CGHY	BSJR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.59%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.45%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.33%	2.12%	+1.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.33%	6.73%	-3.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.33%	9.36%	-6.03%

CGHY vs. BSJR - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGHY has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than BSJR's 0.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGHY vs. BSJR - Dividend Comparison

CGHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.07%, less than BSJR's 5.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BSJR Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	5.74%	6.19%	6.75%	6.48%	5.37%	4.49%	4.53%	1.20%
CGHY Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF	5.07%	3.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGHY and BSJR in my portfolio?

CGHY and BSJR have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CGHY or BSJR?

On fees, CGHY is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGHY or BSJR?

CGHY is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGHY or BSJR?

BSJR has the higher dividend yield at 5.74%, compared with 5.07% for CGHY.

What is the main difference between CGHY and BSJR?

They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for CGHY and 0.42% for BSJR.