PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGHM vs. YYYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGHM vs. YYYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF (CGHM) and Amplify Municipal CEF High Income ETF (YYYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CGHM

1D
0.00%
1M
1.11%
YTD
2.65%
6M
3.10%
1Y
9.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

YYYM

1D
-0.44%
1M
2.03%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGHM vs. YYYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CGHM and YYYM is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2026

0.72

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGHM vs. YYYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGHM
CGHM Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
CGHM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGHM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGHM Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
CGHM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGHM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

YYYM
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGHM vs. YYYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF (CGHM) and Amplify Municipal CEF High Income ETF (YYYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGHMYYYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.39

CGHM vs. YYYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGHMYYYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.15

0.04

+1.11

Drawdowns

CGHM vs. YYYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGHM drawdown since its inception was -5.90%, which is greater than YYYM's maximum drawdown of -5.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGHM and YYYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGHMYYYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.90%

-5.24%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.77%

+0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.25%

-1.29%

+0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

Volatility

CGHM vs. YYYM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGHMYYYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.12%

10.78%

-7.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.53%

10.78%

-6.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.53%

10.78%

-6.25%

CGHM vs. YYYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGHM has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than YYYM's 2.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

CGHM vs. YYYM - Dividend Comparison

CGHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, more than YYYM's 1.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
CGHM
Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF
3.80%3.61%1.78%
YYYM
Amplify Municipal CEF High Income ETF
1.21%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CGHM and YYYM have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CGHM is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CGHM is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 2.78% for YYYM.

CGHM has the higher dividend yield at 3.80%, compared with 1.21% for YYYM.

They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for CGHM and 2.78% for YYYM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGHM and YYYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer