CGHM vs. XLEI
CGHM (Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF) and XLEI (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGHM is a High Yield Muni fund actively managed by Capital Group, while XLEI is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Energy Select Sector. CGHM is actively managed, while XLEI is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.25, they often move in opposite directions. CGHM charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLEI.
Performance
CGHM vs. XLEI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGHM achieves a 2.65% return, which is significantly lower than XLEI's 20.42% return.
CGHM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.11%
- YTD
- 2.65%
- 6M
- 3.10%
- 1Y
- 9.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLEI
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- 1.40%
- YTD
- 20.42%
- 6M
- 20.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CGHM vs. XLEI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CGHM Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF | 2.65% | 6.44% |
XLEI State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 20.42% | 6.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGHM and XLEI is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025 | -0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGHM vs. XLEI — Risk / Return Rank
CGHM
XLEI
CGHM vs. XLEI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF (CGHM) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLEI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CGHM | XLEI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.68 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.71 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.39 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGHM | XLEI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.15 | 2.65 | -1.50 |
Drawdowns
CGHM vs. XLEI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGHM drawdown since its inception was -5.90%, smaller than the maximum XLEI drawdown of -7.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGHM and XLEI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGHM | XLEI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.90% | -7.98% | +2.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.97% | +0.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.25% | -1.52% | +0.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.66% | — | — |
Volatility
CGHM vs. XLEI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGHM | XLEI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.03% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.21% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.12% | 13.16% | -10.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.53% | 13.16% | -8.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.53% | 13.16% | -8.63% |
CGHM vs. XLEI - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGHM has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than XLEI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGHM vs. XLEI - Dividend Comparison
CGHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, less than XLEI's 16.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CGHM Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF | 3.80% | 3.61% | 1.78% |
XLEI State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 16.59% | 10.17% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGHM and XLEI have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CGHM is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CGHM is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XLEI.
XLEI has the higher dividend yield at 16.59%, compared with 3.80% for CGHM.
CGHM is categorized as High Yield Muni, while XLEI is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for CGHM and 0.35% for XLEI.
Find the right allocation for CGHM and XLEI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer