PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGHM vs. HYMU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGHM vs. HYMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF (CGHM) and BlackRock High Yield Muni Income Bond ETF (HYMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CGHM

1D
0.00%
1M
1.11%
YTD
2.65%
6M
3.10%
1Y
9.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HYMU

1D
0.00%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGHM vs. HYMU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGHM vs. HYMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGHM
CGHM Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
CGHM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGHM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGHM Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
CGHM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGHM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

HYMU
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGHM vs. HYMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF (CGHM) and BlackRock High Yield Muni Income Bond ETF (HYMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGHMHYMUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.39

CGHM vs. HYMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGHMHYMUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.15

Drawdowns

CGHM vs. HYMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGHM drawdown since its inception was -5.90%, which is greater than HYMU's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGHM and HYMU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGHMHYMUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.90%

0.00%

-5.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.25%

0.00%

-1.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

Volatility

CGHM vs. HYMU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGHMHYMUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.12%

0.00%

+3.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.53%

0.00%

+4.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.53%

0.00%

+4.53%

CGHM vs. HYMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGHM has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than HYMU's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

CGHM vs. HYMU - Dividend Comparison

CGHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, while HYMU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
CGHM
Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF
3.80%3.61%1.78%
HYMU
BlackRock High Yield Muni Income Bond ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, CGHM is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CGHM is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for HYMU.

CGHM has the higher dividend yield at 3.80%, compared with 0.00% for HYMU.

They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for CGHM and 0.35% for HYMU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGHM and HYMU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer