CGGR vs. GARY

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

CGGR (Capital Group Growth ETF) and GARY (Mango Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CGGR charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for GARY.

Performance

CGGR vs. GARY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGGR achieves a 4.94% return, which is significantly lower than GARY's 31.48% return.

CGGR

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: 1.85%
• 6M: 2.93%
• YTD: 4.94%
• 1Y: 13.82%
• 3Y*: 21.82%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GARY

• 1D: 1.12%
• 1M: 1.12%
• 6M: 24.74%
• YTD: 31.48%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGGR vs. GARY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF	4.94%	0.12%
GARY Mango Growth ETF	31.48%	0.15%

Correlation

The correlation between CGGR and GARY is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2025	0.87

Return for Risk

CGGR vs. GARY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGGR

CGGR Risk / Return Rank: 26
CGGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
CGGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
CGGR Omega Ratio Rank: 26
CGGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
CGGR Martin Ratio Rank: 29

GARY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGGR vs. GARY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CGGR	GARY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.78	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.16	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.92	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.27	—	—

Drawdowns

CGGR vs. GARY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGGR drawdown since its inception was -28.90%, which is greater than GARY's maximum drawdown of -10.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGGR and GARY.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGGR	GARY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.90%	-10.28%	-18.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.13%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.31%	-4.17%	+1.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.60%	-1.88%	-5.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.23%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CGGR	GARY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.01%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.38%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.73%	21.79%	-4.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.96%	21.79%	+0.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.96%	21.79%	+0.17%

CGGR vs. GARY - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGGR has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than GARY's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGGR vs. GARY - Dividend Comparison

CGGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, more than GARY's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF	0.15%	0.10%	0.33%	0.40%	0.33%
GARY Mango Growth ETF	0.04%	0.05%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGGR and GARY in my portfolio?

CGGR and GARY have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CGGR or GARY?

On fees, CGGR is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGGR or GARY?

CGGR is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for GARY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGGR or GARY?

CGGR has the higher dividend yield at 0.15%, compared with 0.04% for GARY.

What is the main difference between CGGR and GARY?

They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Mango. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for CGGR and 0.77% for GARY.