PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGGO vs. CGHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGGO vs. CGHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO) and Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF (CGHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGGO achieves a 13.74% return, which is significantly higher than CGHY's 2.26% return.


CGGO

1D
-2.04%
1M
-4.88%
6M
9.20%
YTD
13.74%
1Y
24.25%
3Y*
18.23%
5Y*
10Y*

CGHY

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.05%
6M
1.60%
YTD
2.26%
1Y
6.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGGO vs. CGHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CGGO and CGHY is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.64

The correlation between CGGO and CGHY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGGO vs. CGHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGGO
CGGO Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
CGGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGGO Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
CGGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGGO Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

CGHY
CGHY Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
CGHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGHY Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
CGHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGHY Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGGO vs. CGHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO) and Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF (CGHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CGGOCGHYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.39

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

2.74

-0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.69

12.47

-4.78

CGGO vs. CGHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGGO Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the CGHY Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGGO and CGHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CGGO vs. CGHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGGO drawdown since its inception was -24.90%, which is greater than CGHY's maximum drawdown of -2.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGGO and CGHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGGOCGHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.90%

-2.38%

-22.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.15%

-2.38%

-10.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.47%

-0.12%

-7.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.43%

-0.30%

-5.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

0.52%

+2.64%

Volatility

CGGO vs. CGHY - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO) has a higher volatility of 8.09% compared to Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF (CGHY) at 0.67%. This indicates that CGGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGGOCGHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.09%

0.67%

+7.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.76%

2.71%

+15.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.76%

3.31%

+16.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.10%

3.27%

+15.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.10%

3.27%

+15.83%

CGGO vs. CGHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGGO has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than CGHY's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

CGGO vs. CGHY - Dividend Comparison

CGGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than CGHY's 5.45% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CGGO
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
1.01%2.03%1.10%0.76%0.59%
CGHY
Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF
5.45%3.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CGGO and CGHY have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CGGO has higher volatility (8.09%) compared to CGHY (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGGO dropped -24.90% vs CGHY's -2.38%.

On 1-year performance, CGGO leads with 24.25% vs 6.48% for CGHY. On fees, CGHY is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, CGHY has been the lower-risk option at 0.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CGGO has performed better with a 24.25% return vs 6.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CGHY is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for CGGO.

CGHY has the higher dividend yield at 5.45%, compared with 1.01% for CGGO.

CGGO is categorized as Global Equities, while CGHY is High Yield Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for CGGO and 0.39% for CGHY.

CGHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGGO and CGHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer