CGGG vs. DLN
CGGG (Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF) and DLN (WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - CGGG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group, while DLN is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Index. CGGG is actively managed, while DLN is passively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CGGG charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for DLN.
Performance
CGGG vs. DLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGGG achieves a -1.93% return, which is significantly lower than DLN's 9.95% return.
CGGG
- 1D
- -2.10%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- YTD
- -1.93%
- 6M
- -2.47%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DLN
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 9.95%
- 6M
- 9.49%
- 1Y
- 21.42%
- 3Y*
- 18.12%
- 5Y*
- 12.49%
- 10Y*
- 12.86%
CGGG vs. DLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CGGG Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF | -1.93% | 10.90% |
DLN WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund | 9.95% | 10.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGGG and DLN is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.57 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGGG vs. DLN — Risk / Return Rank
CGGG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DLN
CGGG vs. DLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF (CGGG) and WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund (DLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CGGG | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.43 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.53 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 14.80 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CGGG vs. DLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGGG drawdown since its inception was -17.75%, smaller than the maximum DLN drawdown of -57.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGGG and DLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGGG | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.75% | -57.84% | +40.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.75% | -1.12% | -4.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.82% | -7.50% | +3.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.45% | — |
Volatility
CGGG vs. DLN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGGG | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.78% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.00% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.33% | 9.03% | +9.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.33% | 13.27% | +5.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.33% | 16.14% | +2.19% |
CGGG vs. DLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGGG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than DLN's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGGG vs. DLN - Dividend Comparison
CGGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than DLN's 1.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGGG Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF | 0.07% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DLN WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund | 1.79% | 1.90% | 2.00% | 2.43% | 2.53% | 2.01% | 2.66% | 2.51% | 2.90% | 2.33% | 2.64% | 2.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGGG and DLN have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DLN is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DLN is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for CGGG.
DLN has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.07% for CGGG.
CGGG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while DLN is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for CGGG and 0.28% for DLN.
Find the right allocation for CGGG and DLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer