CGGG vs. CGIC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CGGG (Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF) and CGIC (Capital Group International Core Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGGG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group, while CGIC is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group. Both are actively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CGGG charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.54%/yr for CGIC.

Performance

CGGG vs. CGIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF (CGGG) and Capital Group International Core Equity ETF (CGIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGGG achieves a 2.00% return, which is significantly lower than CGIC's 12.85% return.

CGGG

• 1D: -1.28%
• 1M: 1.82%
• YTD: 2.00%
• 6M: 2.02%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CGIC

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: 5.13%
• YTD: 12.85%
• 6M: 15.39%
• 1Y: 30.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGGG vs. CGIC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CGGG Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF	2.00%	10.45%
CGIC Capital Group International Core Equity ETF	12.85%	13.43%

Correlation

The correlation between CGGG and CGIC is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025	0.67

Return for Risk

CGGG vs. CGIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGIC

CGIC Risk / Return Rank: 58
CGIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
CGIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
CGIC Omega Ratio Rank: 60
CGIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
CGIC Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGGG vs. CGIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF (CGGG) and Capital Group International Core Equity ETF (CGIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGGG	CGIC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.06	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.78	1.48	-0.70

Drawdowns

CGGG vs. CGIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGGG drawdown since its inception was -17.75%, which is greater than CGIC's maximum drawdown of -13.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGGG and CGIC.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGGG	CGIC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.75%	-13.10%	-4.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.98%	-1.04%	-0.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.80%	-2.54%	-1.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.93%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CGGG	CGIC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.82%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.82%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.50%	15.01%	+2.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.50%	16.14%	+1.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.50%	16.14%	+1.36%

CGGG vs. CGIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGGG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than CGIC's 0.54% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGGG vs. CGIC - Dividend Comparison

CGGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than CGIC's 1.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CGGG Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF	0.07%	0.07%	0.00%
CGIC Capital Group International Core Equity ETF	1.32%	1.60%	0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGGG and CGIC in my portfolio?

CGGG and CGIC have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CGGG or CGIC?

On fees, CGGG is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGGG or CGIC?

CGGG is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for CGIC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGGG or CGIC?

CGIC has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.07% for CGGG.

What is the main difference between CGGG and CGIC?

CGGG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while CGIC is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for CGGG and 0.54% for CGIC.