CGGG vs. CGGO
CGGG (Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF) and CGGO (Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGGG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group, while CGGO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CGGG charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for CGGO.
Performance
CGGG vs. CGGO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGGG achieves a -1.93% return, which is significantly lower than CGGO's 17.98% return.
CGGG
- 1D
- -2.10%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- YTD
- -1.93%
- 6M
- -2.47%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CGGO
- 1D
- -4.02%
- 1M
- 3.86%
- YTD
- 17.98%
- 6M
- 17.46%
- 1Y
- 34.69%
- 3Y*
- 21.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CGGG vs. CGGO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CGGG Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF | -1.93% | 10.90% |
CGGO Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF | 17.98% | 12.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGGG and CGGO is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.84 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGGG vs. CGGO — Risk / Return Rank
CGGG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CGGO
CGGG vs. CGGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF (CGGG) and Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CGGG | CGGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.34 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.65 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.66 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CGGG vs. CGGO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGGG drawdown since its inception was -17.75%, smaller than the maximum CGGO drawdown of -24.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGGG and CGGO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGGG | CGGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.75% | -24.90% | +7.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.75% | -4.02% | -1.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.82% | -5.46% | +1.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.98% | — |
Volatility
CGGG vs. CGGO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGGG | CGGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.82% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.81% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.33% | 18.89% | -0.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.33% | 18.99% | -0.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.33% | 18.99% | -0.66% |
CGGG vs. CGGO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGGG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than CGGO's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGGG vs. CGGO - Dividend Comparison
CGGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than CGGO's 1.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGGG Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF | 0.07% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CGGO Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF | 1.72% | 2.03% | 1.10% | 0.76% | 0.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGGG and CGGO have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CGGG is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CGGG is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for CGGO.
CGGO has the higher dividend yield at 1.72%, compared with 0.07% for CGGG.
CGGG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while CGGO is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for CGGG and 0.47% for CGGO.
Find the right allocation for CGGG and CGGO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer