CGGE vs. WBIF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CGGE (Capital Group Global Equity ETF) and WBIF (WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CGGE returned 22.27% vs 23.01% for WBIF. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CGGE charges 0.47%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for WBIF.

Performance

CGGE vs. WBIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Global Equity ETF (CGGE) and WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGGE achieves a 9.07% return, which is significantly lower than WBIF's 11.61% return.

CGGE

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: 4.96%
• YTD: 9.07%
• 6M: 10.03%
• 1Y: 22.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WBIF

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: 5.70%
• YTD: 11.61%
• 6M: 10.57%
• 1Y: 23.01%
• 3Y*: 8.85%
• 5Y*: 2.38%
• 10Y*: 5.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGGE vs. WBIF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CGGE Capital Group Global Equity ETF	9.07%	24.50%	2.30%
WBIF WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF	11.61%	9.16%	-2.47%

Correlation

The correlation between CGGE and WBIF is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2024	0.72

The correlation between CGGE and WBIF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

CGGE vs. WBIF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CGGE	WBIF
Technology	29.7%	19.9%
Industrials	18.4%	14.6%
Financial Services	14.3%	31.0%
Communication Services	9.0%	2.6%
Healthcare	7.2%	3.4%
Consumer Cyclical	5.0%	11.1%
Utilities	4.8%	10.3%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	3.1%
Energy	3.2%	2.9%
Basic Materials	2.8%	1.0%
Real Estate	1.0%	-

Return for Risk

CGGE vs. WBIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGGE

CGGE Risk / Return Rank: 47
CGGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
CGGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
CGGE Omega Ratio Rank: 46
CGGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
CGGE Martin Ratio Rank: 55

WBIF

WBIF Risk / Return Rank: 62
WBIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
WBIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
WBIF Omega Ratio Rank: 55
WBIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
WBIF Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGGE vs. WBIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Global Equity ETF (CGGE) and WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CGGE	WBIF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	1.88	-0.25
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.36	2.73	-0.36
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.34	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.05	3.50	-1.46
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.38	12.53	-3.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CGGE vs. WBIF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGGE Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the WBIF Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGGE and WBIF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGGE	WBIF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.63	1.88	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.19	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.45	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.21	0.30	+0.91

Drawdowns

CGGE vs. WBIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGGE drawdown since its inception was -14.44%, smaller than the maximum WBIF drawdown of -20.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGGE and WBIF.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGGE	WBIF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.44%	-20.29%	+5.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.93%	-6.60%	-4.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.16%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.29%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-20.29%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.66%	-0.97%	+0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.77%	-7.74%	+5.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.38%	1.84%	+0.54%

Volatility

CGGE vs. WBIF - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group Global Equity ETF (CGGE) and WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF) have volatilities of 4.26% and 4.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGGE	WBIF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.26%	4.13%	+0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.52%	8.63%	+2.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.75%	12.31%	+1.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.39%	12.86%	+2.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.39%	12.34%	+3.05%

CGGE vs. WBIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGGE has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than WBIF's 1.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGGE vs. WBIF - Dividend Comparison

CGGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, more than WBIF's 0.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CGGE Capital Group Global Equity ETF	0.37%	0.40%	0.35%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WBIF WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF	0.06%	0.14%	1.17%	0.82%	0.96%	2.59%	0.09%	1.04%	0.77%	0.75%	0.67%	0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGGE and WBIF in my portfolio?

CGGE and WBIF have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CGGE or WBIF?

CGGE has higher volatility (4.26%) compared to WBIF (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGGE dropped -14.44% vs WBIF's -20.29%.

Which ETF is better, CGGE or WBIF?

On 1-year performance, WBIF leads with 23.01% vs 22.27% for CGGE. On fees, CGGE is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, WBIF has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CGGE or WBIF?

Over the 1-year period, WBIF has performed better with a 23.01% return vs 22.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGGE or WBIF?

CGGE is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for WBIF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGGE or WBIF?

CGGE has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.06% for WBIF.

What is the main difference between CGGE and WBIF?

They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and WBI. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for CGGE and 1.25% for WBIF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WBIF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.