CGGE vs. NZAC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CGGE (Capital Group Global Equity ETF) and NZAC (SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF) are both Global Equities funds. CGGE is actively managed, while NZAC is passively managed. Over the past year, CGGE returned 22.27% vs 24.74% for NZAC. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CGGE charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for NZAC.

Performance

CGGE vs. NZAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Global Equity ETF (CGGE) and SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CGGE having a 9.07% return and NZAC slightly lower at 8.83%.

CGGE

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: 4.96%
• YTD: 9.07%
• 6M: 10.03%
• 1Y: 22.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NZAC

• 1D: -0.82%
• 1M: 4.49%
• YTD: 8.83%
• 6M: 9.51%
• 1Y: 24.74%
• 3Y*: 19.06%
• 5Y*: 9.88%
• 10Y*: 12.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGGE vs. NZAC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CGGE Capital Group Global Equity ETF	9.07%	24.50%	2.30%
NZAC SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF	8.83%	20.55%	5.47%

Correlation

The correlation between CGGE and NZAC is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2024	0.93

The correlation between CGGE and NZAC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

CGGE vs. NZAC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CGGE	NZAC
Technology	29.7%	34.3%
Industrials	18.4%	7.3%
Financial Services	14.3%	13.1%
Communication Services	9.0%	8.5%
Healthcare	7.2%	7.8%
Consumer Cyclical	5.0%	8.2%
Utilities	4.8%	1.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	1.0%
Energy	3.2%	1.2%
Basic Materials	2.8%	1.9%
Real Estate	1.0%	5.2%

Return for Risk

CGGE vs. NZAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGGE

CGGE Risk / Return Rank: 47
CGGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
CGGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
CGGE Omega Ratio Rank: 46
CGGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
CGGE Martin Ratio Rank: 55

NZAC

NZAC Risk / Return Rank: 56
NZAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
NZAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
NZAC Omega Ratio Rank: 55
NZAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
NZAC Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGGE vs. NZAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Global Equity ETF (CGGE) and SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CGGE	NZAC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	1.92	-0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.36	2.71	-0.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.34	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.05	2.46	-0.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.38	10.68	-1.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CGGE vs. NZAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGGE Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the NZAC Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGGE and NZAC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGGE	NZAC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.63	1.92	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.71	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.21	0.61	+0.60

Drawdowns

CGGE vs. NZAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGGE drawdown since its inception was -14.44%, smaller than the maximum NZAC drawdown of -33.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGGE and NZAC.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGGE	NZAC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.44%	-33.72%	+19.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.93%	-10.10%	-0.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.19%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.31%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.66%	-0.82%	+0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.77%	-5.32%	+3.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.38%	2.32%	+0.06%

Volatility

CGGE vs. NZAC - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group Global Equity ETF (CGGE) has a higher volatility of 4.26% compared to SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) at 3.72%. This indicates that CGGE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NZAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGGE	NZAC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.26%	3.72%	+0.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.52%	10.34%	+1.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.75%	12.94%	+0.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.39%	16.81%	-1.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.39%	17.14%	-1.75%

CGGE vs. NZAC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGGE has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than NZAC's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGGE vs. NZAC - Dividend Comparison

CGGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than NZAC's 2.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CGGE Capital Group Global Equity ETF	0.37%	0.40%	0.35%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NZAC SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF	2.04%	1.90%	1.88%	1.65%	1.81%	1.62%	1.59%	2.17%	2.53%	2.20%	2.00%	2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGGE and NZAC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, CGGE and NZAC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CGGE or NZAC?

CGGE has higher volatility (4.26%) compared to NZAC (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGGE dropped -14.44% vs NZAC's -33.72%.

Which ETF is better, CGGE or NZAC?

On 1-year performance, NZAC leads with 24.74% vs 22.27% for CGGE. On fees, NZAC is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, NZAC has been the lower-risk option at 3.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CGGE or NZAC?

Over the 1-year period, NZAC has performed better with a 24.74% return vs 22.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGGE or NZAC?

NZAC is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for CGGE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGGE or NZAC?

NZAC has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 0.37% for CGGE.

What is the main difference between CGGE and NZAC?

They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for CGGE and 0.12% for NZAC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NZAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.