CGDV vs. FBCG

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

CGDV (Capital Group Dividend Value ETF) and FBCG (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group, while FBCG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CGDV returned 24.27%/yr vs 29.20%/yr for FBCG. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CGDV charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FBCG.

Performance

CGDV vs. FBCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGDV achieves a 10.15% return, which is significantly lower than FBCG's 11.60% return.

CGDV

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 1.46%
• YTD: 10.15%
• 6M: 10.88%
• 1Y: 27.58%
• 3Y*: 24.27%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBCG

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: 0.82%
• YTD: 11.60%
• 6M: 10.83%
• 1Y: 33.02%
• 3Y*: 29.20%
• 5Y*: 14.88%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGDV vs. FBCG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	10.15%	25.50%	20.10%	28.81%	-2.89%
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	11.60%	18.60%	39.05%	57.98%	-26.49%

Correlation

The correlation between CGDV and FBCG is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022	0.79

The correlation between CGDV and FBCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

CGDV vs. FBCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CGDV	FBCG
Technology	34.1%	48.3%
Industrials	13.2%	5.7%
Healthcare	11.5%	6.7%
Consumer Cyclical	10.6%	17.2%
Communication Services	8.4%	16.6%
Financial Services	6.8%	2.2%
Consumer Defensive	5.5%	1.3%
Energy	3.8%	0.4%
Basic Materials	2.9%	0.6%
Utilities	2.1%	0.5%
Real Estate	1.1%	0.7%

Return for Risk

CGDV vs. FBCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGDV

CGDV Risk / Return Rank: 76
CGDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
CGDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
CGDV Omega Ratio Rank: 81
CGDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
CGDV Martin Ratio Rank: 77

FBCG

FBCG Risk / Return Rank: 53
FBCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
FBCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
FBCG Omega Ratio Rank: 54
FBCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
FBCG Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGDV vs. FBCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CGDV	FBCG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.34	1.75	+0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.20	2.33	+0.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.31	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.84	2.19	+0.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.37	8.45	+4.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CGDV vs. FBCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is higher than the FBCG Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGDV and FBCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGDV	FBCG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.34	1.75	+0.60
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.21	0.80	+0.41

Drawdowns

CGDV vs. FBCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGDV drawdown since its inception was -21.82%, smaller than the maximum FBCG drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGDV and FBCG.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGDV	FBCG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.82%	-43.56%	+21.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.75%	-15.17%	+5.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.28%	-27.89%	+13.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-43.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.22%	-4.46%	+2.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.61%	-11.47%	+7.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.07%	3.92%	-1.85%

Volatility

CGDV vs. FBCG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) is 3.60%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) has a volatility of 6.44%. This indicates that CGDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGDV	FBCG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.60%	6.44%	-2.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.47%	14.61%	-5.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.85%	19.05%	-7.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.51%	25.86%	-10.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.51%	25.76%	-10.25%

CGDV vs. FBCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGDV has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than FBCG's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGDV vs. FBCG - Dividend Comparison

CGDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, more than FBCG's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	1.19%	1.29%	1.60%	1.65%	1.36%	0.00%	0.00%
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	0.04%	0.05%	0.12%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGDV and FBCG in my portfolio?

CGDV and FBCG have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CGDV or FBCG?

FBCG has higher volatility (6.44%) compared to CGDV (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGDV dropped -21.82% vs FBCG's -43.56%.

Which ETF is better, CGDV or FBCG?

On 3-year performance, FBCG leads with 29.20% vs 24.27% for CGDV. On fees, CGDV is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, CGDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CGDV or FBCG?

Over the 3-year period, FBCG has performed better with a 29.20% return vs 24.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGDV or FBCG?

CGDV is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FBCG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGDV or FBCG?

CGDV has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.04% for FBCG.

What is the main difference between CGDV and FBCG?

CGDV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while FBCG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CGDV and 0.59% for FBCG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.