CGDG vs. PID
Compare and contrast key facts about Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG) and Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID).
CGDG and PID are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CGDG is an actively managed fund by Capital Group. It was launched on Sep 26, 2023. PID is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq International Dividend Achievers (NR). It was launched on Sep 15, 2005.
Performance
CGDG vs. PID - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CGDG vs. PID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CGDG Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF | 1.58% | 22.74% | 11.52% | 9.54% |
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 2.35% | 24.45% | 3.08% | 10.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGDG achieves a 1.58% return, which is significantly lower than PID's 2.35% return.
CGDG
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -3.72%
- YTD
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 4.35%
- 1Y
- 18.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PID
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -4.47%
- YTD
- 2.35%
- 6M
- 6.24%
- 1Y
- 20.80%
- 3Y*
- 11.67%
- 5Y*
- 9.60%
- 10Y*
- 9.01%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CGDG vs. PID - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGDG has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than PID's 0.56% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CGDG vs. PID — Risk / Return Rank
CGDG
PID
CGDG vs. PID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG) and Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CGDG | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.34 | 1.63 | -0.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.90 | 2.39 | -0.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.34 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | 2.41 | -0.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.71 | 10.39 | -1.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGDG | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 1.63 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.51 | 0.26 | +1.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between CGDG and PID is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CGDG vs. PID - Dividend Comparison
CGDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than PID's 3.37% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGDG Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF | 1.94% | 1.95% | 2.15% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 3.37% | 3.28% | 3.88% | 3.31% | 3.30% | 3.30% | 3.16% | 3.99% | 3.87% | 3.46% | 3.90% | 4.48% |
Drawdowns
CGDG vs. PID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGDG drawdown since its inception was -10.52%, smaller than the maximum PID drawdown of -66.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGDG and PID.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGDG | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.52% | -66.34% | +55.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.90% | -8.69% | -1.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.61% | -5.07% | +0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.29% | -13.12% | +11.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | 2.05% | +0.14% |
Volatility
CGDG vs. PID - Volatility Comparison
Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG) has a higher volatility of 4.64% compared to Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID) at 3.73%. This indicates that CGDG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CGDG | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.64% | 3.73% | +0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.30% | 7.11% | +1.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.10% | 12.81% | +1.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.22% | 13.95% | -1.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.22% | 17.98% | -5.76% |