CGDG vs. FWD

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

CGDG (Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF) and FWD (AB Disruptors ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CGDG returned 18.16% vs 43.64% for FWD. Their 0.66 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CGDG charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FWD.

Performance

CGDG vs. FWD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG) and AB Disruptors ETF (FWD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGDG achieves a 10.05% return, which is significantly lower than FWD's 26.86% return.

CGDG

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: 2.09%
• 6M: 7.43%
• YTD: 10.05%
• 1Y: 18.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.45%

FWD

• 1D: 3.48%
• 1M: -3.71%
• 6M: 17.24%
• YTD: 26.86%
• 1Y: 43.64%
• 3Y*: 33.32%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 33.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CGDG Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF	$21.91M	$21.23M	$23.24M
FWD AB Disruptors ETF	$44.02M	$42.79M	$37.28M

CGDG vs. FWD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CGDG Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF	10.05%	22.74%	11.52%	10.17%
FWD AB Disruptors ETF	26.86%	32.00%	29.23%	17.83%

Correlation

The correlation between CGDG and FWD is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2023	0.66

The correlation between CGDG and FWD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

CGDG vs. FWD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CGDG	FWD
Financial Services	20.3%	0.5%
Technology	15.5%	51.2%
Healthcare	10.7%	8.1%
Industrials	10.6%	16.7%
Consumer Defensive	10.4%	0.8%
Utilities	8.0%	0.3%
Consumer Cyclical	7.6%	3.4%
Energy	6.4%	0.8%
Basic Materials	4.9%	1.8%
Real Estate	3.6%	0.8%
Communication Services	2.3%	3.8%

Return for Risk

CGDG vs. FWD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CGDG

CGDG Risk / Return Rank: 64
CGDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
CGDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
CGDG Omega Ratio Rank: 62
CGDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
CGDG Martin Ratio Rank: 68

FWD

FWD Risk / Return Rank: 53
FWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
FWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
FWD Omega Ratio Rank: 49
FWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
FWD Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CGDG vs. FWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG) and AB Disruptors ETF (FWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CGDG	FWD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	1.48	+0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	1.99	+0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.25	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.36	2.14	+0.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.30	8.05	+1.25

CGDG vs. FWD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGDG Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the FWD Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGDG and FWD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CGDG vs. FWD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGDG drawdown since its inception was -10.52%, smaller than the maximum FWD drawdown of -29.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGDG and FWD.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGDG	FWD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.52%	-29.02%	+18.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.72%	-20.49%	+12.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-11.01%	+11.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.28%	-4.28%	+3.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.96%	5.44%	-3.48%

Volatility

CGDG vs. FWD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG) is 2.44%, while AB Disruptors ETF (FWD) has a volatility of 11.58%. This indicates that CGDG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGDG	FWD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.44%	11.58%	-9.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.50%	25.05%	-16.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.81%	29.63%	-18.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.04%	26.06%	-14.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.04%	26.06%	-14.02%

CGDG vs. FWD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGDG has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than FWD's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGDG vs. FWD - Dividend Comparison

CGDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, more than FWD's 0.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CGDG Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF	2.22%	1.95%	2.15%	0.39%
FWD AB Disruptors ETF	0.09%	0.11%	1.89%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGDG and FWD in my portfolio?

CGDG and FWD have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CGDG or FWD?

FWD has higher volatility (11.58%) compared to CGDG (2.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGDG dropped -10.52% vs FWD's -29.02%.

Which ETF is better, CGDG or FWD?

On 1-year performance, FWD leads with 43.64% vs 18.16% for CGDG. On fees, CGDG is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, CGDG has been the lower-risk option at 2.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CGDG or FWD?

Over the 1-year period, FWD has performed better with a 43.64% return vs 18.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGDG or FWD?

CGDG is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FWD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGDG or FWD?

CGDG has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 0.09% for FWD.

What is the main difference between CGDG and FWD?

They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for CGDG and 0.65% for FWD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.