PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGDG vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGDG vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGDG achieves a 4.98% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 83.68% return.


CGDG

1D
-0.45%
1M
1.00%
YTD
4.98%
6M
5.58%
1Y
15.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DBE

1D
2.33%
1M
-5.45%
YTD
83.68%
6M
74.95%
1Y
84.41%
3Y*
23.42%
5Y*
19.66%
10Y*
12.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGDG vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CGDG
Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF
4.98%22.74%11.52%9.54%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
83.68%-2.17%2.96%-16.03%

Correlation

The correlation between CGDG and DBE is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2023

-0.07

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between CGDG and DBE has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.07 to -0.30, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGDG vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGDG
CGDG Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
CGDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGDG Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
CGDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGDG Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGDG vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGDGDBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.40

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

5.89

-3.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.88

11.53

-3.65

CGDG vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGDG Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGDG and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGDGDBEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

2.43

-0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.53

0.09

+1.43

Drawdowns

CGDG vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGDG drawdown since its inception was -10.52%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGDG and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGDGDBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.52%

-86.69%

+76.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.72%

-14.41%

+6.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.41%

-30.27%

+28.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.32%

-57.31%

+55.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

7.35%

-5.36%

Volatility

CGDG vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG) is 3.24%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 12.95%. This indicates that CGDG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGDGDBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.24%

12.95%

-9.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.28%

30.86%

-22.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.63%

34.97%

-24.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.16%

29.39%

-17.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.16%

28.33%

-16.17%

CGDG vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGDG has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

CGDG vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

CGDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than DBE's 2.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CGDG
Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF
1.88%1.95%2.15%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.10%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


CGDG and DBE have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBE has higher volatility (12.95%) compared to CGDG (3.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGDG dropped -10.52% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 1-year performance, DBE leads with 84.41% vs 15.66% for CGDG. On fees, CGDG is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, CGDG has been the lower-risk option at 3.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DBE has performed better with a 84.41% return vs 15.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CGDG is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.

DBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 1.88% for CGDG.

CGDG is categorized as Global Equities, while DBE is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for CGDG and 0.78% for DBE.

DBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGDG and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer