CGDG vs. CGIC

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG) and Capital Group International Core Equity ETF (CGIC).

CGDG and CGIC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CGDG is an actively managed fund by Capital Group. It was launched on Sep 26, 2023. CGIC is an actively managed fund by Capital Group. It was launched on Jun 25, 2024.

Performance

CGDG vs. CGIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG) and Capital Group International Core Equity ETF (CGIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CGDG vs. CGIC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CGDG Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF	1.58%	22.74%	5.42%
CGIC Capital Group International Core Equity ETF	3.18%	37.53%	-2.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGDG achieves a 1.58% return, which is significantly lower than CGIC's 3.18% return.

CGDG

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: -3.72%
• YTD: 1.58%
• 6M: 4.35%
• 1Y: 18.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CGIC

• 1D: 1.21%
• 1M: -5.44%
• YTD: 3.18%
• 6M: 8.49%
• 1Y: 30.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGDG vs. CGIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGDG has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than CGIC's 0.54% expense ratio.

CGIC

Capital Group International Core Equity ETF

CGDG

Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF

Return for Risk

CGDG vs. CGIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGDG

CGDG Risk / Return Rank: 73
CGDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
CGDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
CGDG Omega Ratio Rank: 72
CGDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
CGDG Martin Ratio Rank: 78

CGIC

CGIC Risk / Return Rank: 86
CGIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
CGIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
CGIC Omega Ratio Rank: 87
CGIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
CGIC Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGDG vs. CGIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG) and Capital Group International Core Equity ETF (CGIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CGDG	CGIC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.34	1.79	-0.45
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.90	2.42	-0.52
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.37	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.93	2.75	-0.82
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.71	10.71	-2.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CGDG vs. CGIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGDG Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the CGIC Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGDG and CGIC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGDG	CGIC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.34	1.79	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.51	1.28	+0.23

Correlation

The correlation between CGDG and CGIC is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

CGDG vs. CGIC - Dividend Comparison

CGDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, more than CGIC's 1.45% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CGDG Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF	1.94%	1.95%	2.15%	0.39%
CGIC Capital Group International Core Equity ETF	1.45%	1.60%	0.68%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CGDG vs. CGIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGDG drawdown since its inception was -10.52%, smaller than the maximum CGIC drawdown of -13.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGDG and CGIC.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGDG	CGIC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.52%	-13.10%	+2.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.90%	-11.30%	+1.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.61%	-7.34%	+2.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.29%	-2.55%	+1.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.19%	2.90%	-0.71%

Volatility

CGDG vs. CGIC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG) is 4.64%, while Capital Group International Core Equity ETF (CGIC) has a volatility of 7.26%. This indicates that CGDG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGDG	CGIC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.64%	7.26%	-2.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.30%	11.34%	-3.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.10%	16.99%	-2.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.22%	15.80%	-3.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.22%	15.80%	-3.58%