CGBD vs. FSCO

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CGBD (TCG BDC, Inc.) and FSCO (FS Credit Opportunities Corp.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Asset Management industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 3 years, CGBD returned 3.09%/yr vs 15.58%/yr for FSCO. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CGBD vs. FSCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCG BDC, Inc. (CGBD) and FS Credit Opportunities Corp. (FSCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGBD achieves a -9.03% return, which is significantly higher than FSCO's -17.37% return.

CGBD

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: -8.36%
• YTD: -9.03%
• 6M: -7.55%
• 1Y: -10.27%
• 3Y*: 3.09%
• 5Y*: 7.47%
• 10Y*: —

FSCO

• 1D: -1.60%
• 1M: -5.72%
• YTD: -17.37%
• 6M: -13.72%
• 1Y: -22.32%
• 3Y*: 15.58%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGBD vs. FSCO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CGBD TCG BDC, Inc.	-9.03%	-21.53%	33.53%	18.01%	7.67%
FSCO FS Credit Opportunities Corp.	-17.37%	3.68%	34.88%	36.98%	7.16%

Correlation

The correlation between CGBD and FSCO is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2022	0.20

Return for Risk

CGBD vs. FSCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGBD

CGBD Risk / Return Rank: 18
CGBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
CGBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
CGBD Omega Ratio Rank: 19
CGBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
CGBD Martin Ratio Rank: 15

FSCO

FSCO Risk / Return Rank: 11
FSCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
FSCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
FSCO Omega Ratio Rank: 9
FSCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
FSCO Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGBD vs. FSCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCG BDC, Inc. (CGBD) and FS Credit Opportunities Corp. (FSCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CGBD	FSCO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.48	-0.83	+0.35
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.57	-1.03	+0.45
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	0.86	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.57	-0.64	+0.07
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.17	-1.35	+0.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CGBD vs. FSCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGBD Sharpe Ratio is -0.48, which is higher than the FSCO Sharpe Ratio of -0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGBD and FSCO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGBD	FSCO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.48	-0.83	+0.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.20	0.58	-0.39

Drawdowns

CGBD vs. FSCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGBD drawdown since its inception was -71.09%, which is greater than FSCO's maximum drawdown of -35.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGBD and FSCO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGBD	FSCO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.09%	-35.53%	-35.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.72%	-35.53%	+15.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.06%	-35.53%	+0.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.06%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.04%	-27.85%	-3.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.46%	-7.80%	-4.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.66%	16.80%	-7.14%

Volatility

CGBD vs. FSCO - Volatility Comparison

TCG BDC, Inc. (CGBD) and FS Credit Opportunities Corp. (FSCO) have volatilities of 5.32% and 5.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGBD	FSCO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.32%	5.31%	+0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.10%	22.73%	-5.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.45%	27.05%	-5.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.51%	27.72%	-6.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.72%	27.72%	+7.00%

Dividends

CGBD vs. FSCO - Dividend Comparison

CGBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.60%, less than FSCO's 15.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CGBD TCG BDC, Inc.	14.60%	13.21%	10.43%	11.76%	11.46%	10.92%	14.33%	13.00%	13.55%	6.09%
FSCO FS Credit Opportunities Corp.	15.96%	12.65%	10.47%	11.26%	1.95%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGBD and FSCO in my portfolio?

CGBD and FSCO have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CGBD or FSCO?

CGBD has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to FSCO (5.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGBD dropped -71.09% vs FSCO's -35.53%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGBD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.48 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.