PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CGBD vs. PNNT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CGBD and PNNT is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

CGBD vs. PNNT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCG BDC, Inc. (CGBD) and PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
9.17%
1.82%
CGBD
PNNT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CGBD:

1.78

PNNT:

0.52

Sortino Ratio

CGBD:

2.37

PNNT:

0.79

Omega Ratio

CGBD:

1.32

PNNT:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

CGBD:

2.51

PNNT:

0.62

Martin Ratio

CGBD:

7.08

PNNT:

1.50

Ulcer Index

CGBD:

4.33%

PNNT:

6.34%

Daily Std Dev

CGBD:

17.23%

PNNT:

18.41%

Max Drawdown

CGBD:

-71.09%

PNNT:

-82.16%

Current Drawdown

CGBD:

-1.35%

PNNT:

-4.95%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CGBD:

$936.17M

PNNT:

$453.81M

EPS

CGBD:

$1.73

PNNT:

$0.75

PE Ratio

CGBD:

10.63

PNNT:

9.27

PEG Ratio

CGBD:

3.54

PNNT:

0.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

CGBD:

$149.77M

PNNT:

$77.72M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CGBD:

$123.45M

PNNT:

$63.02M

EBITDA (TTM)

CGBD:

$122.67M

PNNT:

$43.31M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGBD achieves a 2.06% return, which is significantly higher than PNNT's -1.01% return.


CGBD

YTD

2.06%

1M

2.75%

6M

9.17%

1Y

30.69%

5Y*

20.26%

10Y*

N/A

PNNT

YTD

-1.01%

1M

-0.02%

6M

1.82%

1Y

9.79%

5Y*

13.88%

10Y*

10.63%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CGBD vs. PNNT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGBD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CGBD is 8888
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CGBD is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CGBD is 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CGBD is 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CGBD is 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CGBD is 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

PNNT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PNNT is 6262
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PNNT is 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PNNT is 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PNNT is 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PNNT is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PNNT is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CGBD vs. PNNT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCG BDC, Inc. (CGBD) and PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CGBD, currently valued at 1.78, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.001.780.52
The chart of Sortino ratio for CGBD, currently valued at 2.37, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.370.79
The chart of Omega ratio for CGBD, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.321.11
The chart of Calmar ratio for CGBD, currently valued at 2.51, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.510.62
The chart of Martin ratio for CGBD, currently valued at 7.08, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.007.081.50
CGBD
PNNT

The current CGBD Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is higher than the PNNT Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGBD and PNNT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.78
0.52
CGBD
PNNT

Dividends

CGBD vs. PNNT - Dividend Comparison

CGBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.22%, less than PNNT's 13.28% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CGBD
TCG BDC, Inc.
10.22%10.43%11.76%11.46%10.92%14.33%13.00%13.55%6.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PNNT
PennantPark Investment Corporation
13.28%12.85%11.65%10.43%6.93%11.71%11.03%11.30%10.42%14.62%18.12%11.75%

Drawdowns

CGBD vs. PNNT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGBD drawdown since its inception was -71.09%, smaller than the maximum PNNT drawdown of -82.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGBD and PNNT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-1.35%
-4.95%
CGBD
PNNT

Volatility

CGBD vs. PNNT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TCG BDC, Inc. (CGBD) is 4.36%, while PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT) has a volatility of 7.32%. This indicates that CGBD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PNNT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
4.36%
7.32%
CGBD
PNNT

Financials

CGBD vs. PNNT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TCG BDC, Inc. and PennantPark Investment Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab