CGBD vs. SPY
CGBD (TCG BDC, Inc.) is a stock, while SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 5 years, CGBD returned 6.67%/yr vs 13.83%/yr for SPY. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CGBD vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGBD achieves a -12.18% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 10.91% return.
CGBD
- 1D
- -3.47%
- 1M
- -12.13%
- YTD
- -12.18%
- 6M
- -12.14%
- 1Y
- -14.18%
- 3Y*
- 1.88%
- 5Y*
- 6.67%
- 10Y*
- —
SPY
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.05%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.91%
- 1Y
- 27.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.49%
CGBD vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGBD TCG BDC, Inc. | -12.18% | -21.53% | 33.53% | 18.01% | 17.70% | 49.48% | -8.34% | 21.62% | -31.01% | 18.17% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 10.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGBD and SPY is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2017 | 0.41 |
The correlation between CGBD and SPY shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGBD vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
CGBD
SPY
CGBD vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCG BDC, Inc. (CGBD) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CGBD | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.43 | -0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | 3.16 | -3.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.46 | 14.72 | -16.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGBD | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.66 | 2.38 | -3.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.82 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.59 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
CGBD vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGBD drawdown since its inception was -71.09%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGBD and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGBD | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.09% | -55.19% | -15.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.72% | -8.88% | -10.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.06% | -18.76% | -16.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.06% | -24.50% | -10.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.43% | -0.70% | -32.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.47% | -9.05% | -3.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.72% | 1.91% | +7.81% |
Volatility
CGBD vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
TCG BDC, Inc. (CGBD) has a higher volatility of 6.03% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 2.84%. This indicates that CGBD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGBD | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.03% | 2.84% | +3.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.43% | 8.90% | +8.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.70% | 11.83% | +9.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.57% | 17.05% | +4.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.74% | 17.94% | +16.80% |
Dividends
CGBD vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
CGBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.12%, more than SPY's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGBD TCG BDC, Inc. | 15.12% | 13.21% | 10.43% | 11.76% | 11.46% | 10.92% | 14.33% | 13.00% | 13.55% | 6.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGBD and SPY have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CGBD has higher volatility (6.03%) compared to SPY (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGBD dropped -71.09% vs SPY's -55.19%.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CGBD and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer