ZWQT.TO vs. BMAX.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about BMO Global Enhanced Income Fund Series ETF (ZWQT.TO) and Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF (BMAX.TO).
ZWQT.TO and BMAX.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZWQT.TO is an actively managed fund by BMO. It was launched on Jun 19, 2023. BMAX.TO is managed by Brompton Funds.
Performance
ZWQT.TO vs. BMAX.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZWQT.TO vs. BMAX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ZWQT.TO BMO Global Enhanced Income Fund Series ETF | 0.71% | 14.08% | 17.82% | 8.19% |
BMAX.TO Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF | -2.51% | 17.88% | 19.42% | 8.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZWQT.TO achieves a 0.71% return, which is significantly higher than BMAX.TO's -2.51% return.
ZWQT.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -3.64%
- YTD
- 0.71%
- 6M
- 5.39%
- 1Y
- 13.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BMAX.TO
- 1D
- 1.60%
- 1M
- -6.63%
- YTD
- -2.51%
- 6M
- 0.67%
- 1Y
- 13.77%
- 3Y*
- 14.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZWQT.TO vs. BMAX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZWQT.TO has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than BMAX.TO's 2.62% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ZWQT.TO vs. BMAX.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZWQT.TO
BMAX.TO
ZWQT.TO vs. BMAX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Global Enhanced Income Fund Series ETF (ZWQT.TO) and Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF (BMAX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZWQT.TO | BMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.96 | 0.89 | +0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.36 | 1.29 | +0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.21 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.20 | 1.24 | -0.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.35 | 5.41 | -0.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZWQT.TO | BMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | 0.89 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.36 | 1.16 | +0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZWQT.TO and BMAX.TO is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ZWQT.TO vs. BMAX.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZWQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.57%, less than BMAX.TO's 9.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZWQT.TO BMO Global Enhanced Income Fund Series ETF | 5.57% | 5.54% | 5.96% | 3.30% | 0.00% |
BMAX.TO Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF | 9.43% | 9.70% | 9.64% | 9.55% | 2.41% |
Drawdowns
ZWQT.TO vs. BMAX.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZWQT.TO drawdown since its inception was -14.93%, roughly equal to the maximum BMAX.TO drawdown of -15.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZWQT.TO and BMAX.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZWQT.TO | BMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.93% | -15.42% | +0.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.71% | -11.30% | -0.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.24% | -7.89% | +3.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.54% | -1.92% | +0.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.70% | 2.59% | +0.11% |
Volatility
ZWQT.TO vs. BMAX.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO Global Enhanced Income Fund Series ETF (ZWQT.TO) is 3.46%, while Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF (BMAX.TO) has a volatility of 4.71%. This indicates that ZWQT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BMAX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZWQT.TO | BMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.46% | 4.71% | -1.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.77% | 8.22% | -1.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.40% | 15.51% | -1.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.95% | 13.14% | -2.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.95% | 13.14% | -2.19% |