PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZWQT.TO vs. ZBAL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ZWQT.TO vs. ZBAL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Global Enhanced Income Fund Series ETF (ZWQT.TO) and BMO Balanced ETF (ZBAL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ZWQT.TO vs. ZBAL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ZWQT.TO
BMO Global Enhanced Income Fund Series ETF
0.71%14.08%17.82%8.19%
ZBAL.TO
BMO Balanced ETF
0.37%12.93%16.16%7.57%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZWQT.TO achieves a 0.71% return, which is significantly higher than ZBAL.TO's 0.37% return.


ZWQT.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
-3.64%
YTD
0.71%
6M
5.39%
1Y
13.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZBAL.TO

1D
1.71%
1M
-3.27%
YTD
0.37%
6M
0.67%
1Y
12.70%
3Y*
12.19%
5Y*
7.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ZWQT.TO vs. ZBAL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZWQT.TO has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than ZBAL.TO's 0.18% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ZWQT.TO vs. ZBAL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZWQT.TO
ZWQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
ZWQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZWQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZWQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
ZWQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZWQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

ZBAL.TO
ZBAL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
ZBAL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZBAL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZBAL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ZBAL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZBAL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZWQT.TO vs. ZBAL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Global Enhanced Income Fund Series ETF (ZWQT.TO) and BMO Balanced ETF (ZBAL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZWQT.TOZBAL.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.96

1.23

-0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.36

1.74

-0.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.25

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

1.72

-0.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.35

7.09

-1.74

ZWQT.TO vs. ZBAL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZWQT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is comparable to the ZBAL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZWQT.TO and ZBAL.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZWQT.TOZBAL.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

1.23

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.36

0.83

+0.53

Correlation

The correlation between ZWQT.TO and ZBAL.TO is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

ZWQT.TO vs. ZBAL.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZWQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.57%, more than ZBAL.TO's 1.87% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
ZWQT.TO
BMO Global Enhanced Income Fund Series ETF
5.57%5.54%5.96%3.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZBAL.TO
BMO Balanced ETF
1.87%2.00%2.20%2.49%2.74%2.37%2.55%2.39%

Drawdowns

ZWQT.TO vs. ZBAL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZWQT.TO drawdown since its inception was -14.93%, smaller than the maximum ZBAL.TO drawdown of -20.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZWQT.TO and ZBAL.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ZWQT.TOZBAL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.93%

-20.75%

+5.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.71%

-7.75%

-3.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.24%

-3.58%

-0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.54%

-3.23%

+1.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

1.88%

+0.82%

Volatility

ZWQT.TO vs. ZBAL.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Global Enhanced Income Fund Series ETF (ZWQT.TO) is 3.46%, while BMO Balanced ETF (ZBAL.TO) has a volatility of 4.16%. This indicates that ZWQT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZBAL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ZWQT.TOZBAL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

4.16%

-0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.77%

6.45%

+0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.40%

10.39%

+4.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.95%

8.62%

+2.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.95%

10.16%

+0.79%