PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ZWQT.TO vs. ZLB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

ZWQT.TO vs. ZLB.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about BMO Global Enhanced Income Fund Series ETF (ZWQT.TO) and BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO).

ZWQT.TO and ZLB.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZWQT.TO is an actively managed fund by BMO. It was launched on Jun 19, 2023. ZLB.TO is an actively managed fund by BMO. It was launched on Oct 21, 2011.

Performance

ZWQT.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Global Enhanced Income Fund Series ETF (ZWQT.TO) and BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ZWQT.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023
ZWQT.TO
BMO Global Enhanced Income Fund Series ETF		0.71%14.08%17.82%8.19%
ZLB.TO
BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF		1.42%20.31%15.20%6.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZWQT.TO achieves a 0.71% return, which is significantly lower than ZLB.TO's 1.42% return.

ZWQT.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
-3.64%
YTD
0.71%
6M
5.39%
1Y
13.69%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

ZLB.TO

1D
1.23%
1M
-2.74%
YTD
1.42%
6M
2.74%
1Y
15.44%
3Y*
12.86%
5Y*
11.57%
10Y*
10.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BMO Global Enhanced Income Fund Series ETF

BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF

Often compared with ZWQT.TO:
ZWQT.TO vs. BMAX.TOZWQT.TO vs. ZBAL.TOZWQT.TO vs. XTR.TOZWQT.TO vs. VRIF.TOZWQT.TO vs. ZSP.TOZWQT.TO vs. ZAG.TOZWQT.TO vs. ZEQT.TO
Often compared with ZLB.TO:
ZLB.TO vs. VDY.TOZLB.TO vs. XIU.TOZLB.TO vs. XDIV.TOZLB.TO vs. XMW.TOZLB.TO vs. XBAL.TOZLB.TO vs. XUT.TOZLB.TO vs. XUU-U.TO

ZWQT.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZWQT.TO has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than ZLB.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.

ZWQT.TO
BMO Global Enhanced Income Fund Series ETF
ZLB.TO
BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF

Return for Risk

ZWQT.TO vs. ZLB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ZWQT.TO
ZWQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
ZWQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZWQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZWQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
ZWQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZWQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
ZLB.TO
ZLB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ZLB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZLB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZLB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ZLB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZLB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZWQT.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Global Enhanced Income Fund Series ETF (ZWQT.TO) and BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ZWQT.TOZLB.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.96

1.48

-0.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.36

1.99

-0.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.30

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

2.57

-1.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.35

8.71

-3.36

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZWQT.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZWQT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the ZLB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZWQT.TO and ZLB.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ZWQT.TOZLB.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

1.48

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

1.22

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.84

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.36

1.12

+0.24

Correlation

The correlation between ZWQT.TO and ZLB.TO is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ZWQT.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZWQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.57%, more than ZLB.TO's 1.92% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ZWQT.TO
BMO Global Enhanced Income Fund Series ETF		5.57%5.54%5.96%3.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZLB.TO
BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF		1.92%1.93%2.28%2.56%2.56%2.29%2.72%2.34%2.65%2.42%2.82%2.25%

Drawdowns

ZWQT.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZWQT.TO drawdown since its inception was -14.93%, smaller than the maximum ZLB.TO drawdown of -33.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZWQT.TO and ZLB.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

ZWQT.TOZLB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.93%

-33.96%

+19.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.71%

-6.53%

-5.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-13.04%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-33.96%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.24%

-3.08%

-1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.54%

-2.51%

+0.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

1.93%

+0.77%

Volatility

ZWQT.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO Global Enhanced Income Fund Series ETF (ZWQT.TO) and BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO) have volatilities of 3.46% and 3.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

ZWQT.TOZLB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

3.64%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.77%

7.64%

-0.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.40%

10.52%

+3.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.95%

9.57%

+1.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.95%

12.19%

-1.24%