PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CFWAX vs. CFICX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CFWAX vs. CFICX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Global Water Fund (CFWAX) and Calvert Income Fund (CFICX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFWAX achieves a 3.39% return, which is significantly higher than CFICX's 0.59% return. Over the past 10 years, CFWAX has outperformed CFICX with an annualized return of 8.43%, while CFICX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.01% annualized return.


CFWAX

1D
0.50%
1M
-0.95%
YTD
3.39%
6M
1.94%
1Y
10.11%
3Y*
9.84%
5Y*
4.81%
10Y*
8.43%

CFICX

1D
0.07%
1M
0.64%
YTD
0.59%
6M
0.73%
1Y
6.37%
3Y*
6.12%
5Y*
1.05%
10Y*
3.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CFWAX vs. CFICX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CFWAX
Calvert Global Water Fund
3.39%14.38%3.91%18.34%-19.63%22.59%14.79%28.02%-13.63%18.88%
CFICX
Calvert Income Fund
0.59%8.94%4.11%7.61%-16.07%1.71%8.26%14.75%-3.36%6.57%

Correlation

The correlation between CFWAX and CFICX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2008

-0.00

The correlation between CFWAX and CFICX shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (all time) to 0.47 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CFWAX vs. CFICX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFWAX
CFWAX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
CFWAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CFWAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
CFWAX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
CFWAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
CFWAX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

CFICX
CFICX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
CFICX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CFICX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
CFICX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
CFICX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
CFICX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFWAX vs. CFICX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Global Water Fund (CFWAX) and Calvert Income Fund (CFICX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CFWAXCFICXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.32

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.83

2.07

-1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.50

6.95

-4.45

CFWAX vs. CFICX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFWAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the CFICX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFWAX and CFICX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CFWAXCFICXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

1.73

-0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.19

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.58

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

1.01

-0.61

Drawdowns

CFWAX vs. CFICX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFWAX drawdown since its inception was -39.67%, which is greater than CFICX's maximum drawdown of -21.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFWAX and CFICX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CFWAXCFICXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.67%

-21.28%

-18.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.79%

-3.08%

-9.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.64%

-6.11%

-11.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.17%

-21.28%

-7.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.25%

-21.28%

-14.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.71%

-1.08%

-6.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.96%

-3.46%

-4.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.25%

0.92%

+3.33%

Volatility

CFWAX vs. CFICX - Volatility Comparison

Calvert Global Water Fund (CFWAX) has a higher volatility of 4.43% compared to Calvert Income Fund (CFICX) at 1.50%. This indicates that CFWAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CFICX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CFWAXCFICXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

1.50%

+2.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.65%

2.82%

+7.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.65%

3.69%

+9.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.72%

5.64%

+10.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.94%

5.22%

+11.72%

CFWAX vs. CFICX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFWAX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than CFICX's 0.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

CFWAX vs. CFICX - Dividend Comparison

CFWAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, less than CFICX's 4.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CFICX
Calvert Income Fund
4.74%4.86%4.91%4.05%3.22%2.70%2.96%3.25%3.60%2.96%3.23%2.87%
CFWAX
Calvert Global Water Fund
4.62%4.77%9.25%2.57%1.47%0.93%0.77%0.83%1.30%0.93%0.00%0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


CFWAX and CFICX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CFWAX has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to CFICX (1.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFWAX dropped -39.67% vs CFICX's -21.28%.

CFICX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CFWAX and CFICX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer