PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CFWAX vs. AQWA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CFWAX vs. AQWA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Global Water Fund (CFWAX) and Global X Clean Water ETF (AQWA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CFWAX vs. AQWA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CFWAX
Calvert Global Water Fund
-1.37%14.38%3.91%18.34%-19.63%11.54%
AQWA
Global X Clean Water ETF
1.11%13.15%4.34%20.13%-19.89%15.85%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFWAX achieves a -1.37% return, which is significantly lower than AQWA's 1.11% return.


CFWAX

1D
0.07%
1M
-11.15%
YTD
-1.37%
6M
-1.97%
1Y
12.60%
3Y*
8.77%
5Y*
5.11%
10Y*
8.44%

AQWA

1D
1.97%
1M
-8.83%
YTD
1.11%
6M
-1.57%
1Y
13.23%
3Y*
10.78%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CFWAX vs. AQWA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFWAX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than AQWA's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CFWAX vs. AQWA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFWAX
CFWAX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
CFWAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CFWAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
CFWAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
CFWAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
CFWAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

AQWA
AQWA Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
AQWA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AQWA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
AQWA Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
AQWA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
AQWA Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFWAX vs. AQWA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Global Water Fund (CFWAX) and Global X Clean Water ETF (AQWA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CFWAXAQWADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.79

0.82

-0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.21

1.30

-0.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.16

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.87

1.16

-0.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.32

3.81

-0.50

CFWAX vs. AQWA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFWAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is comparable to the AQWA Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFWAX and AQWA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CFWAXAQWADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

0.82

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.36

+0.03

Correlation

The correlation between CFWAX and AQWA is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CFWAX vs. AQWA - Dividend Comparison

CFWAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, more than AQWA's 1.45% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CFWAX
Calvert Global Water Fund
4.84%4.77%9.25%2.57%1.47%0.93%0.77%0.83%1.30%0.93%0.00%0.03%
AQWA
Global X Clean Water ETF
1.45%1.47%1.40%1.53%1.56%1.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CFWAX vs. AQWA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFWAX drawdown since its inception was -39.67%, which is greater than AQWA's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFWAX and AQWA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CFWAXAQWADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.67%

-29.44%

-10.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.79%

-11.48%

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.96%

-9.17%

-2.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.98%

-8.27%

+0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

3.48%

-0.14%

Volatility

CFWAX vs. AQWA - Volatility Comparison

Calvert Global Water Fund (CFWAX) and Global X Clean Water ETF (AQWA) have volatilities of 5.35% and 5.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CFWAXAQWADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.35%

5.55%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.61%

9.97%

-0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.51%

16.14%

-0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.58%

16.67%

-1.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.86%

16.67%

+0.19%