PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CFWAX vs. CAEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CFWAX vs. CAEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Global Water Fund (CFWAX) and Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFWAX achieves a 3.39% return, which is significantly lower than CAEIX's 23.10% return. Over the past 10 years, CFWAX has underperformed CAEIX with an annualized return of 8.43%, while CAEIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.83% annualized return.


CFWAX

1D
0.50%
1M
-0.95%
YTD
3.39%
6M
1.94%
1Y
10.11%
3Y*
9.84%
5Y*
4.81%
10Y*
8.43%

CAEIX

1D
1.24%
1M
4.18%
YTD
23.10%
6M
23.57%
1Y
49.07%
3Y*
13.90%
5Y*
6.54%
10Y*
11.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CFWAX vs. CAEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CFWAX
Calvert Global Water Fund
3.39%14.38%3.91%18.34%-19.63%22.59%14.79%28.02%-13.63%18.88%
CAEIX
Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund
23.10%32.61%-7.13%5.67%-17.43%6.73%61.52%33.48%-19.26%29.65%

Correlation

The correlation between CFWAX and CAEIX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2008

0.85

The correlation between CFWAX and CAEIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CFWAX vs. CAEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFWAX
CFWAX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
CFWAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CFWAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
CFWAX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
CFWAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
CFWAX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

CAEIX
CAEIX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
CAEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
CAEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFWAX vs. CAEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Global Water Fund (CFWAX) and Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CFWAXCAEIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.52

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.83

6.03

-5.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.50

20.83

-18.33

CFWAX vs. CAEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFWAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the CAEIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFWAX and CAEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CFWAXCAEIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

3.08

-2.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.34

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.60

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.07

+0.33

Drawdowns

CFWAX vs. CAEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFWAX drawdown since its inception was -39.67%, smaller than the maximum CAEIX drawdown of -75.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFWAX and CAEIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CFWAXCAEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.67%

-75.81%

+36.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.79%

-8.39%

-4.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.64%

-24.57%

+6.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.17%

-32.58%

+3.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.25%

-37.54%

+1.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.71%

0.00%

-7.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.96%

-48.64%

+40.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.25%

2.42%

+1.83%

Volatility

CFWAX vs. CAEIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calvert Global Water Fund (CFWAX) is 4.43%, while Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX) has a volatility of 5.76%. This indicates that CFWAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CFWAXCAEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

5.76%

-1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.65%

12.91%

-2.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.65%

16.43%

-2.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.72%

19.18%

-3.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.94%

19.69%

-2.75%

CFWAX vs. CAEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFWAX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than CAEIX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

CFWAX vs. CAEIX - Dividend Comparison

CFWAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, more than CAEIX's 0.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAEIX
Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund
0.59%0.72%1.17%1.07%0.86%0.49%0.82%1.23%2.00%1.40%1.79%0.72%
CFWAX
Calvert Global Water Fund
4.62%4.77%9.25%2.57%1.47%0.93%0.77%0.83%1.30%0.93%0.00%0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


CFWAX and CAEIX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CAEIX has higher volatility (5.76%) compared to CFWAX (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFWAX dropped -39.67% vs CAEIX's -75.81%.

CAEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.08 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CFWAX and CAEIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer