PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CFSTX vs. RFBAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CFSTX vs. RFBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Commerce Short Term Government Fund (CFSTX) and Davis Government Bond Fund (RFBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFSTX achieves a -0.75% return, which is significantly lower than RFBAX's 1.14% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CFSTX having a 1.11% annualized return and RFBAX not far behind at 1.09%.


CFSTX

1D
0.06%
1M
-0.43%
6M
-1.02%
YTD
-0.75%
1Y
1.02%
3Y*
3.38%
5Y*
0.73%
10Y*
1.11%
ALL TIME*
2.39%

RFBAX

1D
0.19%
1M
0.00%
6M
0.88%
YTD
1.14%
1Y
2.81%
3Y*
3.91%
5Y*
1.34%
10Y*
1.09%
ALL TIME*
2.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CFSTX vs. RFBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CFSTX
Commerce Short Term Government Fund
-0.75%5.25%3.12%4.28%-6.59%-1.19%3.09%3.56%1.01%0.84%
RFBAX
Davis Government Bond Fund
1.14%4.49%4.33%3.63%-5.29%-1.48%1.69%3.23%0.42%0.21%

Correlation

The correlation between CFSTX and RFBAX is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 1996

0.65

The correlation between CFSTX and RFBAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CFSTX vs. RFBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CFSTX
CFSTX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
CFSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CFSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
CFSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
CFSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
CFSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

RFBAX
RFBAX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
RFBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
RFBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CFSTX vs. RFBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Commerce Short Term Government Fund (CFSTX) and Davis Government Bond Fund (RFBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CFSTXRFBAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.49

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

4.27

-3.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.14

15.95

-13.81

CFSTX vs. RFBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFSTX Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the RFBAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFSTX and RFBAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CFSTX vs. RFBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFSTX drawdown since its inception was -9.02%, which is greater than RFBAX's maximum drawdown of -8.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFSTX and RFBAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CFSTXRFBAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.02%

-8.03%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.87%

-0.77%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.87%

-0.88%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.97%

-7.50%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.02%

-8.03%

-0.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.75%

-0.19%

-1.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.97%

-1.18%

+0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.76%

0.21%

+0.55%

Volatility

CFSTX vs. RFBAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Commerce Short Term Government Fund (CFSTX) is 0.38%, while Davis Government Bond Fund (RFBAX) has a volatility of 0.53%. This indicates that CFSTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RFBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CFSTXRFBAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.38%

0.53%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.50%

1.36%

+0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85%

1.86%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.36%

2.12%

+0.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.98%

1.78%

+0.20%

CFSTX vs. RFBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFSTX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than RFBAX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

CFSTX vs. RFBAX - Dividend Comparison

CFSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, less than RFBAX's 2.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CFSTX
Commerce Short Term Government Fund
2.47%2.26%1.62%2.05%1.30%1.53%1.99%2.44%1.94%1.61%1.69%1.40%
RFBAX
Davis Government Bond Fund
2.78%3.01%3.23%2.15%0.80%0.57%0.93%1.67%1.17%0.59%0.68%0.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


CFSTX and RFBAX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RFBAX has higher volatility (0.53%) compared to CFSTX (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFSTX dropped -9.02% vs RFBAX's -8.03%.

RFBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CFSTX and RFBAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer