CFSTX vs. RFBAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Commerce Short Term Government Fund (CFSTX) and Davis Government Bond Fund (RFBAX).
CFSTX is managed by Commerce. It was launched on Dec 11, 1994. RFBAX is managed by Davis Funds. It was launched on Nov 30, 1994.
Performance
CFSTX vs. RFBAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CFSTX vs. RFBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFSTX Commerce Short Term Government Fund | 0.04% | 5.25% | 3.12% | 4.28% | -6.59% | -1.19% | 3.09% | 3.56% | 1.01% | 0.84% |
RFBAX Davis Government Bond Fund | 0.51% | 4.49% | 4.33% | 3.63% | -5.29% | -1.48% | 1.69% | 3.23% | 0.42% | 0.21% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CFSTX achieves a 0.04% return, which is significantly lower than RFBAX's 0.51% return. Over the past 10 years, CFSTX has outperformed RFBAX with an annualized return of 1.27%, while RFBAX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.05% annualized return.
CFSTX
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -0.73%
- YTD
- 0.04%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 3.40%
- 3Y*
- 3.69%
- 5Y*
- 0.96%
- 10Y*
- 1.27%
RFBAX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -0.39%
- YTD
- 0.51%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- 3.21%
- 3Y*
- 3.91%
- 5Y*
- 1.25%
- 10Y*
- 1.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CFSTX vs. RFBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CFSTX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than RFBAX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CFSTX vs. RFBAX — Risk / Return Rank
CFSTX
RFBAX
CFSTX vs. RFBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Commerce Short Term Government Fund (CFSTX) and Davis Government Bond Fund (RFBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CFSTX | RFBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.90 | 1.71 | +0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.00 | 2.74 | +0.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.46 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | 4.77 | -1.97 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.07 | 16.11 | -5.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CFSTX | RFBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | 1.71 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.61 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.59 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.14 | 1.05 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between CFSTX and RFBAX is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CFSTX vs. RFBAX - Dividend Comparison
CFSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than RFBAX's 2.77% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFSTX Commerce Short Term Government Fund | 2.17% | 2.26% | 1.62% | 2.05% | 1.30% | 1.53% | 1.99% | 2.44% | 1.94% | 1.61% | 1.69% | 1.40% |
RFBAX Davis Government Bond Fund | 2.77% | 3.01% | 3.23% | 2.15% | 0.80% | 0.57% | 0.93% | 1.67% | 1.17% | 0.59% | 0.68% | 0.75% |
Drawdowns
CFSTX vs. RFBAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFSTX drawdown since its inception was -9.02%, which is greater than RFBAX's maximum drawdown of -8.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFSTX and RFBAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CFSTX | RFBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.02% | -8.03% | -0.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.33% | -0.77% | -0.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.02% | -7.61% | -1.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -9.02% | -8.03% | -0.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.97% | -0.39% | -0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.97% | -1.19% | +0.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.33% | 0.23% | +0.10% |
Volatility
CFSTX vs. RFBAX - Volatility Comparison
Commerce Short Term Government Fund (CFSTX) has a higher volatility of 0.60% compared to Davis Government Bond Fund (RFBAX) at 0.48%. This indicates that CFSTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CFSTX | RFBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.60% | 0.48% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.19% | 1.21% | -0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84% | 1.94% | -0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.31% | 2.06% | +0.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.95% | 1.78% | +0.17% |