CFO vs. BLCR
Compare and contrast key facts about VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Weighted ETF (CFO) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR).
CFO and BLCR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CFO is a passively managed fund by VictoryShares that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap 500 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index. It was launched on Jul 2, 2014. BLCR is an actively managed fund by BlackRock. It was launched on Oct 24, 2023.
Performance
CFO vs. BLCR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CFO vs. BLCR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFO VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Weighted ETF | 1.19% | 8.60% | 15.37% | 7.61% |
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF | -1.47% | 30.93% | 17.07% | 14.18% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CFO achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly higher than BLCR's -1.47% return.
CFO
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -5.03%
- YTD
- 1.19%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- 10.12%
- 3Y*
- 7.78%
- 5Y*
- 3.90%
- 10Y*
- 9.02%
BLCR
- 1D
- 1.63%
- 1M
- -3.72%
- YTD
- -1.47%
- 6M
- 3.77%
- 1Y
- 35.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CFO vs. BLCR - Expense Ratio Comparison
CFO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BLCR's 0.36% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CFO vs. BLCR — Risk / Return Rank
CFO
BLCR
CFO vs. BLCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Weighted ETF (CFO) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CFO | BLCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.64 | 1.70 | -1.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.00 | 2.36 | -1.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.35 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.86 | 3.03 | -2.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.90 | 12.57 | -8.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CFO | BLCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 | 1.70 | -1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 1.44 | -0.82 |
Correlation
The correlation between CFO and BLCR is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CFO vs. BLCR - Dividend Comparison
CFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, more than BLCR's 0.28% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFO VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Weighted ETF | 1.33% | 1.32% | 1.44% | 1.72% | 3.95% | 1.06% | 0.90% | 1.44% | 1.49% | 1.18% | 1.35% | 1.31% |
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF | 0.28% | 0.33% | 0.75% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CFO vs. BLCR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFO drawdown since its inception was -24.35%, which is greater than BLCR's maximum drawdown of -21.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFO and BLCR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CFO | BLCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.35% | -21.29% | -3.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.89% | -12.13% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.03% | -5.59% | +0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.67% | -2.29% | -3.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 2.92% | -0.31% |
Volatility
CFO vs. BLCR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Weighted ETF (CFO) is 4.12%, while Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR) has a volatility of 7.08%. This indicates that CFO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CFO | BLCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.12% | 7.08% | -2.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.21% | 12.55% | -4.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.83% | 21.17% | -5.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.35% | 17.60% | -4.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.27% | 17.60% | -4.33% |