CFNDX vs. QDSNX
CFNDX (Cargile Fund) and QDSNX (AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Over the past 5 years, CFNDX returned 2.37%/yr vs 10.95%/yr for QDSNX. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CFNDX charges 1.52%/yr vs 3.30%/yr for QDSNX.
Performance
CFNDX vs. QDSNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CFNDX achieves a 9.25% return, which is significantly higher than QDSNX's 6.30% return.
CFNDX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 4.98%
- YTD
- 9.25%
- 6M
- 9.16%
- 1Y
- 19.10%
- 3Y*
- 8.57%
- 5Y*
- 2.37%
- 10Y*
- —
QDSNX
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- YTD
- 6.30%
- 6M
- 7.81%
- 1Y
- 14.76%
- 3Y*
- 13.72%
- 5Y*
- 10.95%
- 10Y*
- —
CFNDX vs. QDSNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFNDX Cargile Fund | 9.25% | 11.71% | -0.91% | 6.05% | -14.71% | 6.60% | -5.19% |
QDSNX AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N | 6.30% | 16.14% | 9.56% | 8.62% | 14.48% | 10.35% | 5.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between CFNDX and QDSNX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2020 | 0.23 |
The correlation between CFNDX and QDSNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (5 years) to 0.43 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CFNDX vs. QDSNX — Risk / Return Rank
CFNDX
QDSNX
CFNDX vs. QDSNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cargile Fund (CFNDX) and AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N (QDSNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CFNDX | QDSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.59 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.52 | 7.63 | -5.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.32 | 22.05 | -9.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CFNDX | QDSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | 3.02 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 | 1.44 | -1.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 1.63 | -1.63 |
Drawdowns
CFNDX vs. QDSNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFNDX drawdown since its inception was -99.16%, which is greater than QDSNX's maximum drawdown of -7.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFNDX and QDSNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CFNDX | QDSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.16% | -7.15% | -92.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.72% | -1.97% | -5.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -99.16% | -6.93% | -92.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.16% | -7.15% | -92.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.89% | 0.00% | -98.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.79% | -1.46% | -23.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.57% | 0.68% | +0.89% |
Volatility
CFNDX vs. QDSNX - Volatility Comparison
Cargile Fund (CFNDX) has a higher volatility of 2.52% compared to AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N (QDSNX) at 1.38%. This indicates that CFNDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDSNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CFNDX | QDSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.52% | 1.38% | +1.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.36% | 3.57% | +3.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.69% | 4.99% | +3.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6,034.95% | 7.63% | +6,027.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4,801.90% | 7.31% | +4,794.59% |
CFNDX vs. QDSNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CFNDX has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is lower than QDSNX's 3.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
CFNDX vs. QDSNX - Dividend Comparison
CFNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than QDSNX's 1.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFNDX Cargile Fund | 0.96% | 1.05% | 1.45% | 2.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.16% | 1.24% |
QDSNX AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N | 1.87% | 1.99% | 0.00% | 11.18% | 8.01% | 5.99% | 1.83% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CFNDX and QDSNX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CFNDX has higher volatility (2.52%) compared to QDSNX (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFNDX dropped -99.16% vs QDSNX's -7.15%.
QDSNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CFNDX and QDSNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer