QDSNX vs. QCFNX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N (QDSNX) and AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class N (QCFNX).

QDSNX is an actively managed fund by AQR Funds. It was launched on Jun 8, 2020. QCFNX is an actively managed fund by AQR. It was launched on Jun 18, 2025.

Performance

QDSNX vs. QCFNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N (QDSNX) and AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class N (QCFNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QDSNX vs. QCFNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QDSNX AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N	3.15%	1.06%
QCFNX AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class N	0.90%	1.98%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDSNX achieves a 3.15% return, which is significantly higher than QCFNX's 0.90% return.

QDSNX

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: -0.83%
• YTD: 3.15%
• 6M: 5.90%
• 1Y: 11.69%
• 3Y*: 12.58%
• 5Y*: 10.95%
• 10Y*: —

QCFNX

• 1D: 2.66%
• 1M: -4.11%
• YTD: 0.90%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDSNX vs. QCFNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDSNX has a 3.30% expense ratio, which is higher than QCFNX's 2.42% expense ratio.

QDSNX

AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N

QCFNX

AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class N

Return for Risk

QDSNX vs. QCFNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDSNX

QDSNX Risk / Return Rank: 88
QDSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
QDSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
QDSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
QDSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
QDSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDSNX vs. QCFNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N (QDSNX) and AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class N (QCFNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QDSNX	QCFNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.95	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.47	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.26	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.64	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QDSNX	QCFNX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.95	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.44	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.59	0.50	+1.10

Correlation

The correlation between QDSNX and QCFNX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

QDSNX vs. QCFNX - Dividend Comparison

QDSNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, less than QCFNX's 7.65% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
QDSNX AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N	1.93%	1.99%	0.00%	11.18%	8.01%	5.99%	1.83%
QCFNX AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class N	7.65%	7.72%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

QDSNX vs. QCFNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDSNX drawdown since its inception was -7.15%, smaller than the maximum QCFNX drawdown of -8.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDSNX and QCFNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QDSNX	QCFNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.15%	-8.02%	+0.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.48%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-7.15%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.96%	-5.57%	+4.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.49%	-1.98%	+0.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.30%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QDSNX	QCFNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.61%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.69%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.32%	16.53%	-10.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.63%	16.53%	-8.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.37%	16.53%	-9.16%