CFNDX vs. MOOD

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Cargile Fund (CFNDX) and Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD).

CFNDX is managed by Cargile. It was launched on Jul 8, 2018. MOOD is an actively managed fund by Relative Sentiment. It was launched on May 18, 2022.

Performance

CFNDX vs. MOOD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cargile Fund (CFNDX) and Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CFNDX vs. MOOD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CFNDX Cargile Fund	-6.40%	11.71%	-0.91%	6.05%	0.92%
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF	6.71%	30.39%	12.53%	12.56%	-2.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFNDX achieves a -6.40% return, which is significantly lower than MOOD's 6.71% return.

CFNDX

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -6.59%
• YTD: -6.40%
• 6M: -5.33%
• 1Y: 7.08%
• 3Y*: 3.42%
• 5Y*: -0.16%
• 10Y*: —

MOOD

• 1D: 1.73%
• 1M: -5.99%
• YTD: 6.71%
• 6M: 13.43%
• 1Y: 31.94%
• 3Y*: 18.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CFNDX vs. MOOD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFNDX has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than MOOD's 0.68% expense ratio.

CFNDX

Cargile Fund

MOOD

Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF

Return for Risk

CFNDX vs. MOOD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFNDX

CFNDX Risk / Return Rank: 33
CFNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
CFNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
CFNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 31
CFNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
CFNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 38

MOOD

MOOD Risk / Return Rank: 93
MOOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
MOOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
MOOD Omega Ratio Rank: 95
MOOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
MOOD Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFNDX vs. MOOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cargile Fund (CFNDX) and Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CFNDX	MOOD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.74	2.25	-1.51
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.12	2.68	-1.56
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.45	-0.29
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.84	3.32	-2.48
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.02	11.99	-7.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CFNDX vs. MOOD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFNDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is lower than the MOOD Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFNDX and MOOD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CFNDX	MOOD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74	2.25	-1.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.00	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.00	1.23	-1.23

Correlation

The correlation between CFNDX and MOOD is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CFNDX vs. MOOD - Dividend Comparison

CFNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, more than MOOD's 0.38% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CFNDX Cargile Fund	1.12%	1.05%	1.45%	2.56%	0.00%	0.00%	1.16%	1.24%
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF	0.38%	0.40%	1.33%	1.34%	1.43%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CFNDX vs. MOOD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFNDX drawdown since its inception was -99.16%, which is greater than MOOD's maximum drawdown of -14.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFNDX and MOOD.

Drawdown Indicators

	CFNDX	MOOD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.16%	-14.34%	-84.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.72%	-9.71%	+1.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-99.16%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.05%	-7.29%	-91.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.11%	-2.27%	-20.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.61%	2.69%	-1.08%

Volatility

CFNDX vs. MOOD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cargile Fund (CFNDX) is 3.60%, while Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) has a volatility of 5.20%. This indicates that CFNDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MOOD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CFNDX	MOOD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.60%	5.20%	-1.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.09%	13.00%	-6.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.09%	14.26%	-4.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6,034.96%	12.18%	+6,022.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4,855.97%	12.18%	+4,843.79%