CFNDX vs. VOO
CFNDX (Cargile Fund) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both funds - CFNDX is a Tactical Allocation fund managed by Cargile, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 5 years, CFNDX returned 2.33%/yr vs 13.90%/yr for VOO. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CFNDX charges 1.52%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
CFNDX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CFNDX achieves a 9.15% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.91% return.
CFNDX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 4.47%
- YTD
- 9.15%
- 6M
- 9.28%
- 1Y
- 19.25%
- 3Y*
- 8.53%
- 5Y*
- 2.33%
- 10Y*
- —
VOO
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.93%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.44%
- 5Y*
- 13.90%
- 10Y*
- 15.56%
CFNDX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFNDX Cargile Fund | 9.15% | 11.71% | -0.91% | 6.05% | -14.71% | 6.60% | -4.36% | 9.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -9.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between CFNDX and VOO is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2018 | 0.69 |
Over the past year, CFNDX and VOO have become more correlated (0.98) than their long-term average of 0.69, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CFNDX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
CFNDX
VOO
CFNDX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cargile Fund (CFNDX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CFNDX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.25 | 2.39 | -0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.24 | 3.25 | -0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.43 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.53 | 3.16 | -0.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.39 | 14.73 | -2.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CFNDX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25 | 2.39 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 | 0.83 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.89 | -0.89 |
Drawdowns
CFNDX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFNDX drawdown since its inception was -99.16%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFNDX and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CFNDX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.16% | -33.99% | -65.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.72% | -8.90% | +1.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -99.16% | -18.69% | -80.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.16% | -24.52% | -74.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.89% | -0.70% | -98.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.76% | -3.69% | -21.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.57% | 1.91% | -0.34% |
Volatility
CFNDX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cargile Fund (CFNDX) is 2.52%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that CFNDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CFNDX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.52% | 2.84% | -0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.36% | 8.90% | -1.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.71% | 11.80% | -3.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6,034.95% | 16.81% | +6,018.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4,803.11% | 18.01% | +4,785.10% |
CFNDX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CFNDX has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
CFNDX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
CFNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than VOO's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFNDX Cargile Fund | 0.96% | 1.05% | 1.45% | 2.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.16% | 1.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.03% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, CFNDX and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VOO has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to CFNDX (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFNDX dropped -99.16% vs VOO's -33.99%.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CFNDX and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer