PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CFNDX vs. HSTRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CFNDX vs. HSTRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cargile Fund (CFNDX) and Hussman Strategic Total Return Fund (HSTRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFNDX achieves a 9.25% return, which is significantly higher than HSTRX's 4.14% return.


CFNDX

1D
0.09%
1M
4.98%
YTD
9.25%
6M
9.16%
1Y
19.10%
3Y*
8.57%
5Y*
2.37%
10Y*

HSTRX

1D
0.06%
1M
0.29%
YTD
4.14%
6M
4.60%
1Y
15.23%
3Y*
11.29%
5Y*
5.66%
10Y*
5.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CFNDX vs. HSTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
CFNDX
Cargile Fund
9.25%11.71%-0.91%6.05%-14.71%6.60%-4.36%9.00%0.00%
HSTRX
Hussman Strategic Total Return Fund
4.14%20.33%6.06%6.04%-6.23%1.21%11.45%11.42%2.13%

Correlation

The correlation between CFNDX and HSTRX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2018

0.17

The correlation between CFNDX and HSTRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CFNDX vs. HSTRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFNDX
CFNDX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
CFNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CFNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
CFNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CFNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
CFNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

HSTRX
HSTRX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
HSTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
HSTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFNDX vs. HSTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cargile Fund (CFNDX) and Hussman Strategic Total Return Fund (HSTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CFNDXHSTRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.61

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

6.26

-3.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.32

17.32

-5.00

CFNDX vs. HSTRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFNDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the HSTRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFNDX and HSTRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CFNDXHSTRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

2.94

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

0.89

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

0.86

-0.86

Drawdowns

CFNDX vs. HSTRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFNDX drawdown since its inception was -99.16%, which is greater than HSTRX's maximum drawdown of -13.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFNDX and HSTRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CFNDXHSTRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.16%

-13.53%

-85.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.72%

-2.42%

-5.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.16%

-4.24%

-94.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.16%

-13.53%

-85.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.89%

-1.08%

-97.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.79%

-2.69%

-22.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.57%

0.87%

+0.70%

Volatility

CFNDX vs. HSTRX - Volatility Comparison

Cargile Fund (CFNDX) has a higher volatility of 2.52% compared to Hussman Strategic Total Return Fund (HSTRX) at 1.08%. This indicates that CFNDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CFNDXHSTRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.52%

1.08%

+1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.36%

2.45%

+4.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.69%

5.20%

+3.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6,034.95%

6.42%

+6,028.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4,801.90%

5.90%

+4,796.00%

CFNDX vs. HSTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFNDX has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than HSTRX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

CFNDX vs. HSTRX - Dividend Comparison

CFNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than HSTRX's 2.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CFNDX
Cargile Fund
0.96%1.05%1.45%2.56%0.00%0.00%1.16%1.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HSTRX
Hussman Strategic Total Return Fund
2.36%2.25%2.91%2.54%2.15%1.33%0.52%1.29%1.20%0.37%0.25%0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


CFNDX and HSTRX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CFNDX has higher volatility (2.52%) compared to HSTRX (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFNDX dropped -99.16% vs HSTRX's -13.53%.

HSTRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CFNDX and HSTRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer