CFIT vs. TRBF

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

CFIT (Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF) and TRBF (Angel Oak Total Return ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CFIT charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for TRBF.

Performance

CFIT vs. TRBF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF (CFIT) and Angel Oak Total Return ETF (TRBF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFIT achieves a 5.11% return, which is significantly higher than TRBF's 1.35% return.

CFIT

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: 5.11%
• 6M: 4.53%
• 1Y: 10.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TRBF

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: 1.34%
• YTD: 1.35%
• 6M: 1.05%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CFIT vs. TRBF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CFIT Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF	5.11%	-0.22%
TRBF Angel Oak Total Return ETF	1.35%	0.94%

Correlation

The correlation between CFIT and TRBF is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025	0.51

Return for Risk

CFIT vs. TRBF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFIT

CFIT Risk / Return Rank: 62
CFIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
CFIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
CFIT Omega Ratio Rank: 66
CFIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
CFIT Martin Ratio Rank: 59

TRBF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFIT vs. TRBF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF (CFIT) and Angel Oak Total Return ETF (TRBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CFIT	TRBF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.57	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.53	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.28	—	—

Drawdowns

CFIT vs. TRBF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFIT drawdown since its inception was -4.23%, which is greater than TRBF's maximum drawdown of -2.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFIT and TRBF.

Drawdown Indicators

	CFIT	TRBF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.23%	-2.59%	-1.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.23%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.07%	-0.67%	-0.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.19%	-0.83%	-0.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.15%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CFIT	TRBF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.22%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.70%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.83%	3.77%	+2.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.63%	3.77%	+1.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.63%	3.77%	+1.86%

CFIT vs. TRBF - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFIT has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than TRBF's 0.44% expense ratio.

Dividends

CFIT vs. TRBF - Dividend Comparison

CFIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, more than TRBF's 3.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
CFIT Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF	3.87%	3.14%
TRBF Angel Oak Total Return ETF	3.12%	1.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CFIT and TRBF in my portfolio?

CFIT and TRBF have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CFIT or TRBF?

On fees, TRBF is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CFIT or TRBF?

TRBF is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for CFIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CFIT or TRBF?

CFIT has the higher dividend yield at 3.87%, compared with 3.12% for TRBF.

What is the main difference between CFIT and TRBF?

They also come from different issuers: Cambria and Angel Oak. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for CFIT and 0.44% for TRBF.