CFIHX vs. DGRO

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

CFIHX (American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class F-3) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both funds - CFIHX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by American Funds, while DGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Over the past 5 years, CFIHX returned 9.01%/yr vs 11.37%/yr for DGRO. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CFIHX charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.

Performance

CFIHX vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class F-3 (CFIHX) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFIHX achieves a 7.57% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 8.76% return.

CFIHX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 7.57%
• 6M: 8.35%
• 1Y: 17.95%
• 3Y*: 14.41%
• 5Y*: 9.01%
• 10Y*: —

DGRO

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 1.72%
• YTD: 8.76%
• 6M: 8.87%
• 1Y: 22.75%
• 3Y*: 15.97%
• 5Y*: 11.37%
• 10Y*: 13.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CFIHX vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CFIHX American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class F-3	7.57%	20.76%	9.78%	9.31%	-6.86%	15.39%	3.52%	17.60%	-6.77%	13.12%
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF	8.76%	15.69%	16.62%	10.47%	-7.91%	26.64%	9.50%	29.87%	-2.38%	21.61%

Correlation

The correlation between CFIHX and DGRO is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017	0.88

The correlation between CFIHX and DGRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CFIHX vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFIHX

CFIHX Risk / Return Rank: 65
CFIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
CFIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
CFIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
CFIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
CFIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

DGRO

DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 78
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 78
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFIHX vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class F-3 (CFIHX) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CFIHX	DGRO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	2.40	-0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.10	3.49	-0.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.43	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.79	3.53	-0.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.08	13.65	-2.57

CFIHX vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFIHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFIHX and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CFIHX vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFIHX drawdown since its inception was -25.26%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFIHX and DGRO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CFIHX	DGRO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.26%	-35.10%	+9.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.46%	-6.47%	+0.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.88%	-14.03%	+5.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.45%	-19.31%	+1.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.10%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.72%	-1.29%	+0.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.42%	-3.43%	+0.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.62%	1.67%	-0.05%

Volatility

CFIHX vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class F-3 (CFIHX) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) have volatilities of 2.56% and 2.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CFIHX	DGRO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.56%	2.67%	-0.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.63%	6.94%	-0.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.24%	9.53%	-1.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.03%	13.81%	-3.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.96%	16.63%	-5.67%

CFIHX vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFIHX has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CFIHX vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

CFIHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.61%, more than DGRO's 1.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CFIHX American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class F-3	7.61%	8.03%	5.35%	3.79%	3.77%	3.46%	3.70%	4.41%	4.11%	4.74%	0.00%	0.00%
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF	1.97%	2.09%	2.26%	2.45%	2.34%	1.93%	2.30%	2.21%	2.44%	2.03%	2.27%	2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CFIHX and DGRO in my portfolio?

CFIHX and DGRO have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CFIHX or DGRO?

DGRO has higher volatility (2.67%) compared to CFIHX (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFIHX dropped -25.26% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.