PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CFICX vs. CGBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CFICX vs. CGBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Income Fund (CFICX) and Calvert Green Bond Fund (CGBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFICX achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly higher than CGBIX's 0.40% return. Over the past 10 years, CFICX has outperformed CGBIX with an annualized return of 3.00%, while CGBIX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.89% annualized return.


CFICX

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.18%
YTD
0.52%
6M
0.79%
1Y
6.30%
3Y*
6.10%
5Y*
1.02%
10Y*
3.00%

CGBIX

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.16%
YTD
0.40%
6M
0.68%
1Y
5.52%
3Y*
4.68%
5Y*
0.37%
10Y*
1.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CFICX vs. CGBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CFICX
Calvert Income Fund
0.52%8.94%4.11%7.61%-16.07%1.71%8.26%14.75%-3.36%6.57%
CGBIX
Calvert Green Bond Fund
0.40%7.90%2.00%6.14%-13.08%-1.66%7.02%8.14%0.68%3.17%

Correlation

The correlation between CFICX and CGBIX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2013

0.92

The correlation between CFICX and CGBIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CFICX vs. CGBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFICX
CFICX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
CFICX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CFICX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CFICX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
CFICX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
CFICX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

CGBIX
CGBIX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
CGBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
CGBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFICX vs. CGBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Income Fund (CFICX) and Calvert Green Bond Fund (CGBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CFICXCGBIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.65

1.51

+0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.53

2.27

+0.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.27

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

2.07

+0.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.30

6.29

+1.01

CFICX vs. CGBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFICX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the CGBIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFICX and CGBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CFICXCGBIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

1.51

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.08

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.47

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.00

0.58

+0.43

Drawdowns

CFICX vs. CGBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFICX drawdown since its inception was -21.28%, which is greater than CGBIX's maximum drawdown of -17.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFICX and CGBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CFICXCGBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.28%

-17.46%

-3.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.08%

-2.75%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.11%

-5.10%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.28%

-17.46%

-3.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.28%

-17.46%

-3.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.15%

-1.23%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.46%

-3.52%

+0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

0.90%

+0.02%

Volatility

CFICX vs. CGBIX - Volatility Comparison

Calvert Income Fund (CFICX) has a higher volatility of 1.50% compared to Calvert Green Bond Fund (CGBIX) at 1.32%. This indicates that CFICX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CFICXCGBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.50%

1.32%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.84%

2.56%

+0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.70%

3.49%

+0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.64%

4.96%

+0.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.22%

4.07%

+1.15%

CFICX vs. CGBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFICX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than CGBIX's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

CFICX vs. CGBIX - Dividend Comparison

CFICX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.75%, more than CGBIX's 3.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CFICX
Calvert Income Fund
4.75%4.86%4.91%4.05%3.22%2.70%2.96%3.25%3.60%2.96%3.23%2.87%
CGBIX
Calvert Green Bond Fund
3.76%4.09%3.49%2.37%1.86%1.99%1.85%2.45%2.26%2.54%3.22%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, CFICX and CGBIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CFICX has higher volatility (1.50%) compared to CGBIX (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFICX dropped -21.28% vs CGBIX's -17.46%.

CFICX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CFICX and CGBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer