PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGBIX vs. AMFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CGBIX vs. AMFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Green Bond Fund (CGBIX) and AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CGBIX vs. AMFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CGBIX
Calvert Green Bond Fund
-0.72%7.90%2.00%6.14%-13.08%-1.66%7.02%8.14%0.68%-0.34%
AMFIX
AAMA Income Fund
0.21%3.74%3.48%3.84%-6.26%-1.37%2.24%2.47%0.89%-0.44%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGBIX achieves a -0.72% return, which is significantly lower than AMFIX's 0.21% return.


CGBIX

1D
0.42%
1M
-2.34%
YTD
-0.72%
6M
0.35%
1Y
4.65%
3Y*
4.14%
5Y*
0.25%
10Y*
1.89%

AMFIX

1D
0.17%
1M
-0.49%
YTD
0.21%
6M
1.06%
1Y
2.97%
3Y*
3.23%
5Y*
0.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CGBIX vs. AMFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGBIX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than AMFIX's 0.92% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CGBIX vs. AMFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGBIX
CGBIX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
CGBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CGBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

AMFIX
AMFIX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
AMFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
AMFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGBIX vs. AMFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Green Bond Fund (CGBIX) and AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGBIXAMFIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.31

3.05

-1.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.91

4.95

-3.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.69

-0.46

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

4.18

-2.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.07

21.12

-14.04

CGBIX vs. AMFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGBIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the AMFIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGBIX and AMFIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGBIXAMFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

3.05

-1.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.34

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.56

0.00

Correlation

The correlation between CGBIX and AMFIX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CGBIX vs. AMFIX - Dividend Comparison

CGBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, more than AMFIX's 2.22% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CGBIX
Calvert Green Bond Fund
3.86%4.09%3.49%2.37%1.86%1.99%1.85%2.45%2.26%2.54%3.22%2.01%
AMFIX
AAMA Income Fund
2.22%2.08%2.44%1.70%0.83%0.57%0.83%1.24%1.24%0.40%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CGBIX vs. AMFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGBIX drawdown since its inception was -17.46%, which is greater than AMFIX's maximum drawdown of -9.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGBIX and AMFIX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CGBIXAMFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.46%

-9.35%

-8.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.75%

-0.74%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.46%

-8.91%

-8.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.34%

-0.49%

-1.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.54%

-2.06%

-1.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

0.15%

+0.63%

Volatility

CGBIX vs. AMFIX - Volatility Comparison

Calvert Green Bond Fund (CGBIX) has a higher volatility of 1.37% compared to AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX) at 0.48%. This indicates that CGBIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CGBIXAMFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.37%

0.48%

+0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.19%

0.72%

+1.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.83%

0.98%

+2.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.91%

2.16%

+2.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.05%

1.75%

+2.30%